2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remaining uncertainties in the kinetic mechanism of hydrogen combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
292
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(341 reference statements)
13
292
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the H 2 /O 2 branch of the mechanism by Li et al [9] is replaced with the more recent, high-pressure kinetic scheme by Burke et al [10]. Along with lean mixtures the mechanism of Goswami et al [8] was validated for stoichiometric and rich mixtures and is originally based on the mechanism of Konnov [17]. GRI Mech 3.0 is a mechanism for natural gas combustion including NO formation and reburn chemistry.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the H 2 /O 2 branch of the mechanism by Li et al [9] is replaced with the more recent, high-pressure kinetic scheme by Burke et al [10]. Along with lean mixtures the mechanism of Goswami et al [8] was validated for stoichiometric and rich mixtures and is originally based on the mechanism of Konnov [17]. GRI Mech 3.0 is a mechanism for natural gas combustion including NO formation and reburn chemistry.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these tables, the rate parameters were always given for the forward reaction and a note indicated if the parameters had been calculated from the data of the backward reaction. In this latter case, we also estimated the increase of the uncertainty using equation (9). In all cases we found that for the species of the hydrogen and syngas combustion systems the uncertainty of the thermodynamic data is low, therefore the uncertainty of the backward reaction can be considered to be equal to the uncertainty of the forward reaction.…”
Section: Protocol For Data Collection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[48], Konnov [9], Hong et al [49] , Burke et al [50], and Kéromnès et al [47] . Several of these reviews (Konnov [9], Hong et al [49] and Burke et al [50]) also contain a detailed discussion about the experimental and theoretical determinations of the rate coefficient values.…”
Section: Protocol For Data Collection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations