2015
DOI: 10.1163/9789004290594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining practices as religious rather than secular quarantines them by removing them as potential sources of opposition to the dominant regime (see Chidester 1996Chidester , 2007Fitzgerald 2007aFitzgerald , 2007bStack et al 2015;Goldenberg 2012Goldenberg , 2015. The classification of some group, belief, or practice as a 'religion' or 'religious' is ultimately a contingent act of power.…”
Section: Definitional Problems With Religion and Related Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Defining practices as religious rather than secular quarantines them by removing them as potential sources of opposition to the dominant regime (see Chidester 1996Chidester , 2007Fitzgerald 2007aFitzgerald , 2007bStack et al 2015;Goldenberg 2012Goldenberg , 2015. The classification of some group, belief, or practice as a 'religion' or 'religious' is ultimately a contingent act of power.…”
Section: Definitional Problems With Religion and Related Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I and others have argued consistently that we should be studying the deployments of the category/term/word/idea itself, not only religion, but also others such as 'politics', 'society', 'nature', or 'science', and not the putative data to which it is supposed to correspond. (See also Harrison 2015;Cavanaugh 2009;Stack et al 2015;Horii 2016Horii , 2018Horii , 2021.…”
Section: Definitional Problems With Religion and Related Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we extend this line of argument to the present day, a “critical religion” perspective asserts that the religious–secular distinction naturalizes the value orientations of modern capitalism and nation-states. Given this, “religion” and “secularity” are conceptualized as the categories of governance (Stack, Goldenberg, and Fitzgerald, 2015). Thus, a “critical religion” approach sheds the light on the historical fact that the academic discipline of sociology, ideologically founded upon social theory, emerged from modernist thought which separates the “religious” from the “secular.” Critical reflections on the categories of religion and secularity, which have been pushed forward by “critical religion,” therefore, urge sociologists to challenge their own imperial ideological heritage deeply embedded in their own scholarly epistemology.…”
Section: “Critical Religion” Empire and “Religion” In European Socimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the literature on political performance and especially on processions suggests, the act of public presentation can be a powerful declaration of belonging (Holston and Appadurai 1996: 200;Rai and Reinelt 2015;Stack et al 2015). The dutiful perambulations of the peace activists do much more than merely thwart potential violence; they demonstrate the vitality of active, inter-communal civic life (Varshney 2002) and express the right of citizens to reimagine public space.…”
Section: Contestations Of Legitimacy: Citizenship Claims In the Old Citymentioning
confidence: 99%