1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)00028-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion and economic welfare: An empirical analysis of state per capita income

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result supports the hypothesis that religious adherence or participation requires additional resources in terms of time and good (Barro and McCleary, 2003) or the hypothesis of opportunity cost of time, indicating that higher opportunity cost of time leads to lower adherence (Azzi and Ehrenberg, 1975;Lipford and Tollison, 2003). In general results differ somewhat from previous results obtained using international data (Barro and McCleary, 2003;Sala-i-Martin et al, 2004) and US data (Heath et al, 1995;Gruber, 2005). These differences may be due to two main reasons: data (international vs. regional; state vs. counties; individual survey data vs. cross-section data) and modeling and estimation issues (income growth vs. income levels; endogeneity).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result supports the hypothesis that religious adherence or participation requires additional resources in terms of time and good (Barro and McCleary, 2003) or the hypothesis of opportunity cost of time, indicating that higher opportunity cost of time leads to lower adherence (Azzi and Ehrenberg, 1975;Lipford and Tollison, 2003). In general results differ somewhat from previous results obtained using international data (Barro and McCleary, 2003;Sala-i-Martin et al, 2004) and US data (Heath et al, 1995;Gruber, 2005). These differences may be due to two main reasons: data (international vs. regional; state vs. counties; individual survey data vs. cross-section data) and modeling and estimation issues (income growth vs. income levels; endogeneity).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Noland (2005) finds Protestants having negative effect on short-run growth but positive effect on long-run growth. Heath et al (1995), using US state data and modeling income levels rather than growth, find Catholic and fundamental Protestant variables to be negative and liberal Protestants to be positive. The difference between their results and ours may be due to several reasons: state level data vs. county level data; income levels vs. income growth; account for endogeneity; and mainline Protestants have higher incomes that grow at slower rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although, some literature about religion and economic wellbeing (e.g. Heath et al 1995) exists, papers dealing with the impact of religious believe on travel decisions are currently lacking. So, Vukonic (1996) pictures in his book the interaction between "Tourism and Religion".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite inconclusive results, many studies have shown that a link exists between religion and economic development. Both positive and negative effects of religion on indicators of economic welfare and growth are reported (Chiswick, 1983(Chiswick, , 1993Grier, 1985;Tomes, 1985;Heath, Waters and Watson, 1995;Steen, 1996;Barro and McCleary, 2003;Lipford and Tollison, 2003;Mangeloja, 2005;Bettendorf and Dijkgraaf, 2010). Barro and McCleary (2003) conjecture that the intensity of religious beliefs-rather than mere religious group membership-drives growth because such strong beliefs promote enduring aspects of individual behavior that increase productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%