2023
DOI: 10.1037/met0000519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable network inference from unreliable data: A tutorial on latent network modeling using STRAND.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[208]) and network inference are continually being developed and refined. Generative network models, such as exponential random graph models [209], stochastic actor-oriented models [210], and latent network frameworks [211] hold particular promise, as they allow for the simultaneous consideration of multiple mechanisms operating across scales. New tools that allow for yet more complex network structure (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[208]) and network inference are continually being developed and refined. Generative network models, such as exponential random graph models [209], stochastic actor-oriented models [210], and latent network frameworks [211] hold particular promise, as they allow for the simultaneous consideration of multiple mechanisms operating across scales. New tools that allow for yet more complex network structure (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze these networks, we developed a stochastic blockmodel that accounts for censoring introduced by the focal-follow methodology. More specifically, we extend an existing model for binary cross-sectional data [see ( 54 , 55 )] to adjust for the uneven sampling that characterized our repeated-observation design. Our model can be written succinctly asY[i,j,d]Bernoullifalse(ϕfalse[i,jfalse]false)i<jC[i,j,d]=1Z[i,j,d]=1logitfalse(ϕfalse[i,jfalse]false)=normalα[Afalse(ifalse),Afalse(jfalse)]+X[i,j]βwhere Y [ i , j , d ] is an indicator for if individuals i and j were observed coforaging together on day d , ϕ [ i , j ] is the predicted probability that individuals i and j coforage together, C [ i , j , d ] is an indicator of whether individuals i and j were both in-camp on day d , Z [ i , j , d ] is a censoring mask for day d (defined in more detail later), α is a K × K matrix of within- and between-age-class intercept offset parameters, A(i) is a function returning the age class of individual i , β is a vector of regression coefficients, and X [ i , j ] is a row vector of dyadic covariate data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied Bayesian social network analysis to estimate whether the demographic features of the population structured these social networks. More specifically, we applied a combined social relations and stochastic block model using the STRAND R package (Redhead, McElreath et al, 2023; Ross et al, 2023, version 0.2.0). We specified a model for binomial data and adjusted for the number of times an individual was observed in the data within the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included a combined variable for age class and sex, with adult males and adult females being specified as blocks within the stochastic blockmodel. Accordingly, we were able to estimate whether the probability of observing associations was higher between adults of the same or different sexes (see Redhead, McElreath et al, 2023; Ross et al, 2023, for detailed technical outlines). To aid in interpretation of the results, we computed the contrast coefficient ∆ and highest posterior density intervals ( HPDI ) from the posterior distribution of the age/sex parameters included in our stochastic blockmodel (reflecting how such models have been interpreted in previous research, e.g., Gettler et al, 2023, Redhead, Ragione et al, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%