2003 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2003. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/dsn.2003.1209961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable communication in overlay networks

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, overlay network design for QSON is a challenging issue to investigate. (2) Comparison with various multihoming proposals: Multihoming route control is closely related to overlay routing. It is worth investigating how QSON performs compared with multihoming routing schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, overlay network design for QSON is a challenging issue to investigate. (2) Comparison with various multihoming proposals: Multihoming route control is closely related to overlay routing. It is worth investigating how QSON performs compared with multihoming routing schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Resilient Overlay Networks (RONs) are proposed to detect and recover from Internet path failures by actively monitoring the quality of overlay links and routing packets based on application-specific metrics [3]. The Spine architecture applies TCP-like loss recovery and congestion control on each overlay link to reduce the latency and jitter of reliable connections [2]. Though highly flexible, end-user overlays usually cannot provide end-to-end QoS guarantees, since they normally cross many uncontrolled intermediate domains.…”
Section: Qos Overlay Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu [31] proposed OverlayTFMRC focusing on QoS transport support for multimedia streaming and scalable TCP-friendly multicast congestion control. Although the clustered-receiver-based random delay strategy is employed, the scheme cannot remove the control overheads yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, because the sending sources employ the lowest sending rate calculated by the receivers [30], the throughput in the system with the TCP-friendly control scheme decreases with the increasing number of receivers. Therefore, in [31], the hop-by-hop control rather than the end-to-end technique is suggested to be implemented because of the end hosts' storing and forwarding functions in EMcast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation