Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire

Günaydin, Gürkan; Çıtaker, Seyit; Meray, Jale; Çobanoğlu, Gamze; Günaydın, Özge Ece; Kanık, Zeynep Hazar

doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000001599

Cited by 21 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Pearson's correlation coefficient values showed that the correlation of the Turkish version of ProFitMap-neck with the NDI and VAS was high. In the Br-Portuguese version of the ProFitMap-neck, the correlation values between the domains of the Br-ProFitMap-neck and NDI varied from 0.56 to 0.71 [24]. The results of our study were similar to those for the Br-Portuguese version of the ProFitMap-neck.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…As a result, it appears that the Turkish version of the ProFitMap-neck is highly stable over time. The ICC values ranged from 0.81 to 1 in the Br-Portuguese version of ProFitMap-neck [24]. The researchers indicated that the Br-ProFitMap-neck had high levels of reliability for total score and indices.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…For intrarater reliability, ICCs were only reported in the original and Portuguese versions [12], [24]. While 210 patients were enrolled in the original version, 180 female patients with chronic neck pain participated in the Brazilian (Br) Portuguese version.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The ProFitMap-neck - a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain: reliability, validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version

Çetin¹,

Köse²,

Bilgin³

et al. 2020

Turk J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/aim: The Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire (ProFitMap-neck) is a reliable and valid assessment instrument for measuring neck-related symptoms and functional limitations in people with neck pain, but a Turkish version of it had not been published. The purpose of this study was to investigate the adaptation, validity, and intrarater reliability of the Turkish version of the ProFitMap-neck. Materials and methods: Two hundred and thirty-five individuals with chronic neck pain were enrolled in the study. Intrarater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha was calculated for internal consistency. For concurrent validity, ProFitMap-neck scores were compared with neck disability index (NDI) and visual analoguepain scale (VAS) scores using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis. The ProFitMap-neck, NDI, VAS, and short form health survey (SF-36) were administered to all participants. Results: For intrarater analysis, ICC ranged between 0.72 and 0.84. The total score was 0.83, indicating excellent reliability. The correlation of the ProFitMap-neck with NDI and VAS was 0.71 and 0.68, respectively, indicating good concurrent validity. Conclusion: The ProFitMap-neck is an evaluation instrument with sufficient validity and reliability to be used for evaluating Turkish patients with neck pain. Use of this scale can reveal how, how often, and how much these patients' pain affects their symptoms and functional activities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The ProFitMap-neck - a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain: reliability, validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version

Çetin¹,

Köse²,

Bilgin³

et al. 2020

Turk J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, it is important to present the Turkish version of the NBQ in the literature for using it in clinical practice and research. For the questionnaire validation studies, it is recommended to select the questionnaires which are validated, considered to be the gold standard and context specific if possi- ble [25]. Therefore, one of the questionnaires that we chose in the validation study of the NBQ was the NDI, in which the Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted [24].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Item total correlation and item-deleted Cronbach's alpha coefficient were calculated during this analysis. If this value is above 0.80, it indicates excellent reliability [25].…”

Section: Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain: a cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The cultural adaptation of a self-report measurement in different languages is important for developing common strategies for evaluation and treatment. The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ), which was developed to evaluate patients with neck pain, was adapted from the Bournemouth Questionnaire in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories. The aim of this study was to conduct the Turkish cultural adaptation, validity and reliability study of the NBQ. Material and methods: The study included 119 patients (93 females, 26 males; mean age: 37.2 ±11.8 years) with chronic nonspecific neck pain. The NBQ, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires were administered to all the subjects. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) and the internal consistency (Cronbach's a) were the methods used for the reliability study. The relationship between NBQ, NDI and NHP was investigated for concurrent validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used for construct validity. Results: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire showed good internal consistency (a = 0.87). The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.913 (95% CI: 0.875-0.940). The correlations between NBQ and NDI and NHP were significant (p < 0.05). The questionnaire was found to have one factor and the explained variance was 59.084% as a result of factor analysis. Conclusions: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire is a valid and reliable scale for patients with chronic neck pain in the Turkish population.

show abstract

Bournemouth questionnaire Arabic version: Cross‐cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability for patients with low back pain

Elerian

Abdel-Aal

Abdelhay

2020

Physiotherapy Res Intl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo translate, culturally adapt, validate, and investigate the reliability of Arabic version of Bournemouth questionnaire (BQ) for patients with low back pain.MethodThirty experts (three panels) and 70 low back pain patients (37.5 ± 13.9 years) were involved in this study. Test–retest as well as internal consistency analyses were used to assess reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) was used to assess test–retest analysis, whereas Cronbach alpha value was calculated to assess the internal consistency. BQ Arabic version validity was evaluated in forms of face, content, internal, and external construct validity. Internal construct validity was evaluated with factor analysis, and external construct validity was tested by the correlation between the Arabic version of BQ and short‐form (36) health survey (SF‐36) questionnaire.ResultsFactor analysis revealed that BQ had a single factor. BQ has a very good correlation with SF‐36 questionnaire (r = .74). Arabic version of BQ has a high internal consistency reliability where Cronbach alpha value was 0.889 at baseline and 0.911 after 1 week. The test–retest analysis was between 0.87 and 0.96 and for the BQ total score was 0.95 (p < .0001) indicating that test–retest results are highly correlated.ConclusionThe Arabic version of BQ is a valid, reliable, and feasible scale for assessment of low back patients. It is short, easy‐to‐apply, need short time to complete and comprehensive scale. So it may be considered as a preferable scale for clinical assessment of Arabic speaking patients with low back pain.

show abstract

Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire

Abstract: 3.

Cited by 21 publications

References 36 publications

The ProFitMap-neck - a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain: reliability, validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version

The ProFitMap-neck - a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain: reliability, validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version

The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain: a cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study

Bournemouth questionnaire Arabic version: Cross‐cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability for patients with low back pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About