2016
DOI: 10.14214/sf.1568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the predicted stand structure for clear-cut stands using optional methods: airborne laser scanning-based methods, smartphone-based forest inventory application Trestima and pre-harvest measurement tool EMO

Abstract: Accurate timber assortment information is required before cuttings to optimize wood allocation and logging activities. Timber assortments can be derived from diameter-height distribution that is most often predicted from the stand characteristics provided by forest inventory. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the accuracy of three different pre-harvest inventory methods in predicting the structure of mainly Scots pine-dominated, clear-cut stands. The investigated methods were an area-based approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an analysis, however, requires a distinctively more powerful computability than that applied here, as well as a totally new study design involving large-scale field measurements. Also, including random variation in tree height is an interesting issue, because it will result in a reasonable marginal distribution of tree heights (Siipilehto et al [62]) and simultaneously more realistic timber assortment and quality distribution. This, in turn, would further increase the needed sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an analysis, however, requires a distinctively more powerful computability than that applied here, as well as a totally new study design involving large-scale field measurements. Also, including random variation in tree height is an interesting issue, because it will result in a reasonable marginal distribution of tree heights (Siipilehto et al [62]) and simultaneously more realistic timber assortment and quality distribution. This, in turn, would further increase the needed sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some things are problematic for the area-based approach (ABA) that is currently used for providing raster-and stand-level forest information . For example, accuracy of the species-specific forest inventory attributes is rather limited and that leads to inaccurate predictions for tree size distributions (Siipilehto et al, 2016). Currently there aren't any theories or research ideas presented that could provide major improvements to ABA.…”
Section: Why Do We Need Information From Single Trees?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the most effective use of harvester data, a necessary first step is to estimate the total height of each harvested tree that was bucked, measured and recorded by the harvester head. This necessity has been well recognised, and several attempts to do so have been made in the estimation of logging residue biomass and in the integration of harvester data with remote sensing data in forest inventory for predicting tree and stand attributes and estimating product recoveries (Varjo 1995;Kiljunen 2002;Maltamo et al 2010;Möller et al 2011;Söderberg 2015;Siipilehto et al 2016;Hauglin et al 2018;Lu et al 2018). So far, total tree height has been calculated by estimating the length of the unprocessed top section of individual trees using the only such existing model, that of Varjo (1995), or through an iterative search algorithm using a taper equation as demonstrated well by Lu et al (2018) and also briefly alluded to by Hauglin et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%