2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of recording uterine cancer in death certification in France and age-specific proportions of deaths from cervix and corpus uteri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 41,503 individuals dying in hospital in 2008-2012, 69% received palliative care provided by non-cancer specialists and 56% died in public local hospitals where cancer specialists are under-represented. In agreement with a previous study on the misclassification of uterine cancers in French UCoD records [38], we found that both markers of a lower cancer specialization of the certifying physician were strongly associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in UCoD records. Similarly, death certification at home is generally not performed by a cancer specialist in France and we found that death certification outside hospital (19% of overall deaths in the sensitivity analysis) was associated with a similar degree of under-reporting.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Of 41,503 individuals dying in hospital in 2008-2012, 69% received palliative care provided by non-cancer specialists and 56% died in public local hospitals where cancer specialists are under-represented. In agreement with a previous study on the misclassification of uterine cancers in French UCoD records [38], we found that both markers of a lower cancer specialization of the certifying physician were strongly associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in UCoD records. Similarly, death certification at home is generally not performed by a cancer specialist in France and we found that death certification outside hospital (19% of overall deaths in the sensitivity analysis) was associated with a similar degree of under-reporting.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Due to the high proportion of “uterus, not otherwise specified” in nearly 60% of death certificates, a specific statistical procedure was necessary to obtain the “observed” numbers of deaths for cervix and corpus uteri cancers [ 8 , 29 ]. The proportions of cervix and corpus uteri respectively among all cancer uteri deaths were first estimated by age and year from registry data (by convolution of incidence and survival) and then applied to the observed number of cancer uteri death in France (corpus, uteri or unspecified).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this work was to study the reliability of uterine cancer recordings in death certificates using a case matching with cancer registries and estimated age-specific proportions of deaths from cervix and corpus uteri cancers among all uterine cancer deaths by a statistical approach that uses incidence and survival data [20]. …”
Section: Medic Perspective and A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%