2013
DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamaneurol.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Classifying Multiple Sclerosis Disease Activity Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Multiple Sclerosis Clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this, we assess the value of GBCA administration as lower in the setting of disease monitoring as compared to the diagnostic MRI. However, it cannot be ruled out that GBCA administration may increase sensitivity for new disease activity even at routine follow‐up MRI,42, 43 especially considering the interobserver variability of identifying new or enlarged T2 lesions 22…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, we assess the value of GBCA administration as lower in the setting of disease monitoring as compared to the diagnostic MRI. However, it cannot be ruled out that GBCA administration may increase sensitivity for new disease activity even at routine follow‐up MRI,42, 43 especially considering the interobserver variability of identifying new or enlarged T2 lesions 22…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Quantitative measures made from MRI scans of the brain and spinal cord are also used as secondary outcomes in clinical trials of new putative treatments for MS. Measures of inflammatory activity may be made from contrastenhanced T 1 -weighted images by assessing the number or volume of enhancing lesions.…”
Section: Introdutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time required to confirm disability worsening was 6 months in our study versus 3 months in RCTs. Another difference is that we did not consider enlarged T2 lesions in the assessment of MRI activity, since a previous study demonstrated a poor between-rater agreement for this metric under routine clinical setting [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We decided to not consider enlarged T2-hyperintense lesions since a previous study demonstrated a poor between-rater agreement for this metric under routine clinical setting [32].…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%