2012
DOI: 10.1177/1352458511435717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and equivalence of alternate forms for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test: implications for multiple sclerosis clinical trials

Abstract: For the first time, we find good evidence that at least three alternate versions of the SDMT are of equivalent difficulty in healthy adults. The forms are reliable, and can be implemented in clinical trials emphasizing cognitive outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the SDMT alternate forms created by Benedict and al . 11 These two forms are equivalent to the original version and provide good test-retest reliability. Alternate form one was used for the assessment and alternate form two was used for the retest session.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the SDMT alternate forms created by Benedict and al . 11 These two forms are equivalent to the original version and provide good test-retest reliability. Alternate form one was used for the assessment and alternate form two was used for the retest session.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable of interest was the total number of correct answers given in 90 seconds. Equivalent alternate forms were used for this study (Benedict et al, 2012).…”
Section: Processing Speed/attention Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 It can be administered in children as young as 8 years, is brief (90 seconds), and has alternate forms for repeat testing. 30 When consecutively administered to patients with POMS in an outpatient center, 31 in a sample of 31 cases, the SDMT showed 77% sensitivity and 81% specificity for detecting neuropsychological impairment and had 100% sensitivity when administered twice in less than 2 months.…”
Section: Mri Correlates Of Cognitive Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%