2012
DOI: 10.1029/2012rs005049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative detection efficiency of the World Wide Lightning Location Network

Abstract: [1] Using the detected energy per strokes of the World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) we calculate the relative detection efficiency for the network as if it had a uniform detection efficiency. The model uses the energy statistics of located strokes to determine which stations are sensitive to what stroke energies. We are then able to estimate the number of strokes that may be missing from any given regions as compared to the best, most sensitive regions of the WWLLN network. Stroke density maps can b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
217
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
217
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The network uses a time of group arrival technique on the detected sferic waveforms to locate lightning to within ~5 km and <10 μs, with preferential detection of high peak current cloud to ground strokes. The global detection efficiency of the network is estimated to be ~10% and it is sufficient to enable the network to detect almost all lightning-producing storms [20].…”
Section: Lightning Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network uses a time of group arrival technique on the detected sferic waveforms to locate lightning to within ~5 km and <10 μs, with preferential detection of high peak current cloud to ground strokes. The global detection efficiency of the network is estimated to be ~10% and it is sufficient to enable the network to detect almost all lightning-producing storms [20].…”
Section: Lightning Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to Hutchins et al (2012b), the relative detection efficiency of the WWLLN over the analysis region is about 0.8−0.9. Thus, for this study, the stroke density measured by WWLLN was not corrected.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because detection efficiency is higher for stronger strokes (Rodger et al 2004;Abarca et al 2010) and because the minimum detectable stroke energy of each lightning stroke depends on the minimum observable energy of each WWLLN station (Hutchins et al 2012b), the reliability of data for weak stroke energy is considered insufficient. Therefore, we focus on lightning with strong stroke energy.…”
Section: Seasonal Variation Of Lightningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the detection efficiency of the WWLLN system is not uniform. To overcome this challenge, Hutchins et al (2012b) proposed the "relative detection efficiency" (RDE) parameter, which is calculated using the observed 7-day global stroke energy distribution and the estimated hourly minimum detectable energy for every 5° × 5° grid cell, considering both sferic propagation and the WWLLN site distribution. RDE is defined as the ratio of the number of strokes with energies larger than the minimum detectable energy (MDE) to the overall number of lightning strokes in the 7-day global stroke energy distribution.…”
Section: B Relative Detection Efficiency Of Lightningmentioning
confidence: 99%