2015
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Relationships between quantitative spinal cord MRI and retinal layers in multiple sclerosis
Abstract: Objective: To assess relationships between spinal cord MRI (SC-MRI) and retinal measures, and to evaluate whether these measures independently relate to clinical disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods:One hundred two patients with MS and 11 healthy controls underwent 3-tesla brain and cervical SC-MRI, which included standard T1-and T2-based sequences and diffusion-tensor and magnetization-transfer imaging, and optical coherence tomography with automated segmentation. Clinical assessments included visua… Show more
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
41
15
9
2
Citation Types
6
46
0
1
Year Published
Range
2016
20162025
2025Publication Types
Select...
57
3
1
Relationship
1
60
Authors
Journals
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
References 35 publications
6
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Whether these patterns are generally common to MS patients will need confirmation in larger and different MS patient cohorts. These data are also consistent with recent reports of correlations between spinal cord MRI measurement and retinal layers in MS, and associations between deep gray matter tissue damage and degeneration in cortex and spinal cord …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Whether these patterns are generally common to MS patients will need confirmation in larger and different MS patient cohorts. These data are also consistent with recent reports of correlations between spinal cord MRI measurement and retinal layers in MS, and associations between deep gray matter tissue damage and degeneration in cortex and spinal cord …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In confirmation with previous studies, we found disability is heavily age-dependent [22, 23]. Related to gender [24‒27] or disease duration [24, 25, 27, 28], there are different articles that support our results, concluding no correlation with EDSS. Similarly, there are publications that do not support DMT patients’ history inclusion in an EDSS model [24, 26, 27].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, our results are further corroborated by recent study [24] that assesses SC-OCT correlations. A multivariable model for the EDSS ( R 2 = 0.4) in a mixed cohort revealed that SC area and age were the only examined variables that correlated with EDSS.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results found that above 4.0 the EDSS is not only weighted toward the integrity of the pyramidal tract and the age of the patient, but also, although minimally, it is conditioned by GCL integrity. Finally, our outcomes suggest MS disability is better captured by SC and retinal parameters than brain atrophy, supporting the idea of pathological mechanisms at SC and retina distinct from the brain or at least, less clinically "silent" tissue injury at SC or retina than whole brain [24].…”
Section: Mathematical Model Validation
supporting
confidence: 71%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this study, the overall MTR coefficient of variation (aggregating between‐session, between‐scanner, and between‐participant variabilities) for the centered spinal cord levels C4‐C6 was about 3% (in our case, 1 pu). This value is similar to that reported in previous single‐scanner spinal cord studies (range: 1–2 pu, summarized in Supplementary Table 1), and even slightly smaller . Our result suggests that MTR values obtained using scanners from the same manufacturer with the same acquisition parameters can be used in multicenter studies without any drastic increase in the variability of the MTR measurements, relative to single‐center studies.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Whether these patterns are generally common to MS patients will need confirmation in larger and different MS patient cohorts. These data are also consistent with recent reports of correlations between spinal cord MRI measurement and retinal layers in MS, and associations between deep gray matter tissue damage and degeneration in cortex and spinal cord …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In confirmation with previous studies, we found disability is heavily age-dependent [22, 23]. Related to gender [24‒27] or disease duration [24, 25, 27, 28], there are different articles that support our results, concluding no correlation with EDSS. Similarly, there are publications that do not support DMT patients’ history inclusion in an EDSS model [24, 26, 27].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, our results are further corroborated by recent study [24] that assesses SC-OCT correlations. A multivariable model for the EDSS ( R 2 = 0.4) in a mixed cohort revealed that SC area and age were the only examined variables that correlated with EDSS.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results found that above 4.0 the EDSS is not only weighted toward the integrity of the pyramidal tract and the age of the patient, but also, although minimally, it is conditioned by GCL integrity. Finally, our outcomes suggest MS disability is better captured by SC and retinal parameters than brain atrophy, supporting the idea of pathological mechanisms at SC and retina distinct from the brain or at least, less clinically "silent" tissue injury at SC or retina than whole brain [24].…”
Section: Mathematical Model Validation
supporting
confidence: 71%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this study, the overall MTR coefficient of variation (aggregating between‐session, between‐scanner, and between‐participant variabilities) for the centered spinal cord levels C4‐C6 was about 3% (in our case, 1 pu). This value is similar to that reported in previous single‐scanner spinal cord studies (range: 1–2 pu, summarized in Supplementary Table 1), and even slightly smaller . Our result suggests that MTR values obtained using scanners from the same manufacturer with the same acquisition parameters can be used in multicenter studies without any drastic increase in the variability of the MTR measurements, relative to single‐center studies.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Whether these patterns are generally common to MS patients will need confirmation in larger and different MS patient cohorts. These data are also consistent with recent reports of correlations between spinal cord MRI measurement and retinal layers in MS, and associations between deep gray matter tissue damage and degeneration in cortex and spinal cord …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In confirmation with previous studies, we found disability is heavily age-dependent [22, 23]. Related to gender [24‒27] or disease duration [24, 25, 27, 28], there are different articles that support our results, concluding no correlation with EDSS. Similarly, there are publications that do not support DMT patients’ history inclusion in an EDSS model [24, 26, 27].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, our results are further corroborated by recent study [24] that assesses SC-OCT correlations. A multivariable model for the EDSS ( R 2 = 0.4) in a mixed cohort revealed that SC area and age were the only examined variables that correlated with EDSS.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results found that above 4.0 the EDSS is not only weighted toward the integrity of the pyramidal tract and the age of the patient, but also, although minimally, it is conditioned by GCL integrity. Finally, our outcomes suggest MS disability is better captured by SC and retinal parameters than brain atrophy, supporting the idea of pathological mechanisms at SC and retina distinct from the brain or at least, less clinically "silent" tissue injury at SC or retina than whole brain [24].…”
Section: Mathematical Model Validation
supporting
confidence: 71%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this study, the overall MTR coefficient of variation (aggregating between‐session, between‐scanner, and between‐participant variabilities) for the centered spinal cord levels C4‐C6 was about 3% (in our case, 1 pu). This value is similar to that reported in previous single‐scanner spinal cord studies (range: 1–2 pu, summarized in Supplementary Table 1), and even slightly smaller . Our result suggests that MTR values obtained using scanners from the same manufacturer with the same acquisition parameters can be used in multicenter studies without any drastic increase in the variability of the MTR measurements, relative to single‐center studies.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%