Relationships between Quality Characteristics in the New Two-rowed, Hull-less Barley Cultivar “Yumesakiboshi”

Nakagawa, Takashi; Yanagisawa, Takashi; Minoda, Toyotaka; Shigematsu, O.; Tokura, Kazuyamu; Katou, Tohru

doi:10.6090/jarq.46.151

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This high starch concentration reduces the percentage of protein when expressing grain composition. Whereas, Nagamine et al (2012) found a positive correlation between grain protein content and volume weight only in barley grains cropped in 2008 but not in grains from 2009. The amount of divergent data reported in the literature emphasizes that correlations among grain characteristics can be affected by many factors, such as the wide range of environmental conditions and genetic attributes.…”

Section: /8mentioning

confidence: 78%

“…Negamine et al 2012affirm that TKW had a negative correlation to the pearling time, which means that high TKW is good for food processing. TKW also has a positive correlation with grain size and barley quality (Nagamine et al, 2012), so a high quality classification is expected in malting and food processes for BRS Itanema, followed by BRS Aliensa (PF) and BRS Korbel (PF). Although hull-less varieties presented high TKW, high quality classification is expected only in food processes, since husks are lost during harvest, which is a problem for malting processes (Baik et al, 2011).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Volume weight is a key quality characteristic, especially for farmers, as one of the quality bonus characteristics. In Japan, the standard value for a quality bonus when purchasing barley for food industries is 840 g L -1 (Nagamine et al, 2012). Hectoliter weight is a measure of grain sample density, which can be an indicator of pre-harvest sprouting adversely affecting the grain.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most common classification is covered and hull-less barley, also known as naked, mainly used for human consumption. While in some countries, such as Japan, hull-less barley has several advantages over covered cultivars, including higher crop prices for the farmers and more stable demand from barley food manufacturers (Nagamine et al, 2012), in Brazil, hull-less varieties are only cropped in experimental scales and malt is the main destination for barley grain. An assessment of genetic diversity in Brazilian barley using SSR markers pointed out that the number of alleles detected in genotypes released in the 1980s was higher, whereas most of the cultivars released thereafter showed lower polymorphism information content, clustered in separate subgroups from the older cultivars (Ferreira et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Comparison and quality evaluation of hull-less and covered Brazilian barley for food industry application

Ludwig

Carpentieri-Pípolo

Lopes

et al. 2019

Agraria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Barley has a wide range of end uses. However, the technological characteristics expected from barley present different standards according to the destination of the cereal. Grain β-glucan content is the most important attribute for varieties destined for the food market due to blood glucose and cholesterol-reducing properties. High protein content, test weight, and huller rate may also add value to different end uses. In Brazil, the main destination for barley is malt production; however, not every lot achieves malting standards. To determine the quality of Brazilian barley for food industries, 9 covered barley cultivars and 8 hull-less barley breeding lines were studied. Thousand kernel weight (TKW), hectoliter weight (HW), huller rate (HR), protein, and β-glucan contents were analyzed. The hull-less breeding lines presented higher averages when compared to the covered group, except in protein content. Correlations between "β-glucan and HW", "β-glucan and TKW", and "TKW and HW" were positive. On the other hand, "HW and protein content" and "β-glucan and protein content" presented a negative correlation. There are bromatological quality differences between Brazilian hull-less breeding lines and covered varieties. Brazilian barley germplasm presents great industrial potential, not only for malt production and animal feed but also for human food applications.

show abstract

Section: /8mentioning

confidence: 78%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison and quality evaluation of hull-less and covered Brazilian barley for food industry application

Ludwig

Carpentieri-Pípolo

Lopes

et al. 2019

Agraria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Factors of Fluctuation in Glassy Grain Rate and β-Glucan Content and their Control by Fertilizing Technology in Barley Cultivar Shunrai for Barley Rice.

Okiyama¹,

Yanagisawa

Nakagawa

et al. 2021

Japanese journal of crop science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genetic diversity of traditional genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Algeria by pheno-morphological and agronomic traits

Bouziane¹,

Merdas²,

Nait³

et al. 2015

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Barley ranks third after durum and bread wheat grain production in Algeria. In this study, genetic diversity of twenty nine traditional genotypes of barley was assessed using twenty seven phenomorphological and agronomic traits in presence of four controls. Very high significant differences were found between genotypes for all quantitative characters statistically analyzed, indicating existence of a great variability within the germplasm. Some traditional genotypes differed from all controls by their better mean values of 1000 grain weight, tiller number per spike, grain number per spike and grain protein content. The long-cycle genotypes had higher values of 1000 grain weight, awn length and plant height than those with short cycle. For quantitative traits, the principle component analysis showed that three components could describe 68.27% of total variances and the cluster analysis divided all sixrowed barley studied into three cluster groups. The following traits: 1000 grain weight, awn length, days to heading and maturity, grain width, grain number per spike, plant height, length of first rachis segment and grain length were those contributing more to variability among the genotypes and also but less strongly the tiller spike number per plant and the spike length. The awn length, the 1000 grain weight, the grain width and the plant height were positively correlated with highly significant correlations between the majority of them. On the qualitative traits, the growth habit, the curvature of the first rachis segment and the lower leaf sheath hairiness were the traits which varied more between all genotypes.

show abstract

Relationships between Quality Characteristics in the New Two-rowed, Hull-less Barley Cultivar “Yumesakiboshi”

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Comparison and quality evaluation of hull-less and covered Brazilian barley for food industry application

Comparison and quality evaluation of hull-less and covered Brazilian barley for food industry application

Factors of Fluctuation in Glassy Grain Rate and β-Glucan Content and their Control by Fertilizing Technology in Barley Cultivar Shunrai for Barley Rice.

Genetic diversity of traditional genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Algeria by pheno-morphological and agronomic traits

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About