1986
DOI: 10.5558/tfc62440-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Between Growth Form and Stand Density in Immature Douglas-fir

Abstract: Stem form of the whole tree and branching characteristics at whorls 6 to 10 were examined in 27-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) trees est.;;: . at each of three s= ,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Weiskittel et al (2007) found the number of branches in Douglasfir to be insensitive to Swiss needle cast disease, varying levels of vegetation control, pre as well as commercial thinning, or fertilization. In contrast, increased spacing resulted in a greater number of branches for some whorls in a 27-year-old Douglas-fir stand on Vancouver Island, British Columbia/CDN (Carter et al 1986). It might be speculated, that a part of the large variation in number of branches observed in this study perhaps might be attributed to possible genetic differences between the installations.…”
Section: Number Of Living and Dead Branchesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Likewise, Weiskittel et al (2007) found the number of branches in Douglasfir to be insensitive to Swiss needle cast disease, varying levels of vegetation control, pre as well as commercial thinning, or fertilization. In contrast, increased spacing resulted in a greater number of branches for some whorls in a 27-year-old Douglas-fir stand on Vancouver Island, British Columbia/CDN (Carter et al 1986). It might be speculated, that a part of the large variation in number of branches observed in this study perhaps might be attributed to possible genetic differences between the installations.…”
Section: Number Of Living and Dead Branchesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The traditional allometric model (Y = aX b ) widely used in biomass studies (Feller, 1992), may be precise enough for tree biomass, but is often unsatisfactory for canopy biomass components such as branches. Other predictors, as crown geometry and site index, which influence biomass production and allocation, probably need to be added to the model to improve its accuracy for these components (Brown, 1978;Carter et al, 1986).…”
Section: Biomass Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of branches on the stem apex is in part controlled by stand density, site fertility, and the general individual growth potential of a tree (Kenk and Unfried 1980;Carter et al 1986;Ma¨kinen et al 2003). Increasing vigour and growth rate of a tree increases the number of new branches but at the same time, the number of branches is also under moderate genetic control (Velling 1988;Vestøl et al 1999).…”
Section: Number Of Living and Dead Branchesmentioning
confidence: 99%