2009
DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2009/0175-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between freshwater sedimentary diatoms and environmental variables in Subarctic Icelandic lakes

Abstract: Abstract:The distribution patterns of surface sediment diatom assemblages from 49 lakes were used to explore the relationship between limnological variables and diatom assemblages as well as to assess an ecological classifi cation system as a tool for the management and conservation of Icelandic freshwaters. Lakes were limnologically diverse ranging from deep, oligotrophic, ionically dilute lakes, to shallow lakes with a wide range of nutrient and ionic contents. Physical conditions (depth, surface area, surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These gradual diatom trends are more difficult to interpret because the earlier diatom assemblages were dominated by several species and varieties of small benthic fragilarioid taxa, and early changes in PCA axes scores reflect subtle fluctuations among these taxa. Deciphering meaningful ecological differences among this group of fragilarioid taxa has always been a challenge [45][46][47], making palaeolimnological inferences based on changes among these taxa difficult. In the absence of additional monitoring data or regional stressor information in this remote region, we cannot draw definitive conclusions as to the underlying mechanism for these subtle fluctuations among benthic diatoms, but they probably reflect catchment-scale disturbances or natural variability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These gradual diatom trends are more difficult to interpret because the earlier diatom assemblages were dominated by several species and varieties of small benthic fragilarioid taxa, and early changes in PCA axes scores reflect subtle fluctuations among these taxa. Deciphering meaningful ecological differences among this group of fragilarioid taxa has always been a challenge [45][46][47], making palaeolimnological inferences based on changes among these taxa difficult. In the absence of additional monitoring data or regional stressor information in this remote region, we cannot draw definitive conclusions as to the underlying mechanism for these subtle fluctuations among benthic diatoms, but they probably reflect catchment-scale disturbances or natural variability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have considered that these taxa are generalists with an r-strategy and their rapid substrate colonization and high reproduction rate confer them resilience to short-term environmental fluctuations, making them very competitive species under unstable limnological conditions (Lotter and Bigler 2000;Weckström and Juggins 2006;Lotter et al 2010). The presence of a given genus and species of this group has been used as an indication of changes in prolonged ice cover, water temperature, nutrient status, salinity, pH and climatedriven environmental variables (Smol 1988;Dixit et al 1992;Wilson et al 1997;Douglas and Smol 1999;Lotter and Bigler 2000;Karst-Riddoch et al 2009). Thus, they are regarded as good environmental indicators in research projects focused on paleo-and neolimnological conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autecological studies in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago have determined habitat preferences of individual diatom species based on their distribution and abundances in different habitats (e.g., Bouchard et al 2004;Cremer et al 2005;Karst-Riddoch et al 2009). Planktonic diatoms, in Arctic lakes Cyclotella sensu lato, often increase in both relative and absolute abundances in response to availability of open water habitat during warm climate intervals (Douglas and Smol 1999;Rühland et al 2008;Devlin and Finkelstein 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%