2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among sustainability dimensions: evidence from an Alpine area case study using Dominance-based Rough Set Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first and the third types of rule represent the certain knowledge extracted from data, while the second and the fourth types of rule represent the possible knowledge. The fifth type of rule represents doubtful knowledge, because it is supported only by inconsistent objects [52,57]. Furthermore, a set of decision rules is complete when it covers all the considered objects (i.e., the examples of ordinal classification) in such a way that the consistent objects are re-assigned to their original classes, while the inconsistent objects are assigned to clusters of classes referring to this inconsistency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and the third types of rule represent the certain knowledge extracted from data, while the second and the fourth types of rule represent the possible knowledge. The fifth type of rule represents doubtful knowledge, because it is supported only by inconsistent objects [52,57]. Furthermore, a set of decision rules is complete when it covers all the considered objects (i.e., the examples of ordinal classification) in such a way that the consistent objects are re-assigned to their original classes, while the inconsistent objects are assigned to clusters of classes referring to this inconsistency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of the state of sustainability at different territorial levels (in our case municipalities) allows policy makers to target policies and strategies for achieving a balance between the different sustainability dimensions. The literature offers numerous applications relating to the measurement of sustainability [5,8,9,12,36] mainly in rural areas, but peripheral areas are not excluded. Our study, compared to those proposed by the literature, focuses on four territorial typologies that hinge on the concept of periphery, connecting it to that of rurality, which, in the selected municipalities, has been shown to be either intermediate rural or rural with comprehensive development problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a territorial sustainable development perspective, a multi-criteria approach is recognized as a useful tool [8,9], about which a vast and growing literature has been developed [10][11][12]. More specifically, we used the rough set theory (RST) approach because of its capacity to discover hidden patterns in data [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policymakers and the general public would appreciate it if they know the environmental situation at any given moment, and a single indicator would be ideal [25]. Some of the common environmental sustainability indicators are reported as follows [26][27][28][29]:…”
Section: Environmental Sustainability and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%