2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(20)33669-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, no overall survival (OS) data were obtained. Even though PFS was widely accepted as an adequate surrogate and even more meaningful than OS [43,44], OS 8 remains important for efficacy prediction. Another limitation is the absence of a control group to control for confounding from external factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, no overall survival (OS) data were obtained. Even though PFS was widely accepted as an adequate surrogate and even more meaningful than OS [43,44], OS 8 remains important for efficacy prediction. Another limitation is the absence of a control group to control for confounding from external factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary endpoint was PFS, which was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented disease progression or death. 18 Progression was defined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Imaging was performed every 6 weeks and was analyzed at each participating center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Time to progression (TTP) was calculated as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression, but cancer death was not included. 18 The lung cancer symptom scale was used to evaluate the health-related quality of life and functional dimensions of life. 20 The proportions of patients with cancer with measurable lesions achieving a response were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important clinical endpoints in assessing treatments for CLL include OS, PFS and quality of life (QoL). 11 The time to next treatment (TTNT) is also a relevant endpoint as it represents the time patients are off therapy and may have the freedom to work or travel. The longer the TTNT, the greater the positive impact on patients QoL as well as the greater chance a patient may have to access novel agents that will likely become available in the future.…”
Section: Cll11 Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%