2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11365-011-0191-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between organizations, institutions, entrepreneurship and economic growth process

Abstract: The main goal of this paper is to show that organizations and institutions play a relevant role in the economic growth process, both directly and indirectly. Human capital plays a direct role by facilitating the introduction and use of new technologies. A more indirect role is play by entrepreneurial activity in three ways: 1) supplying monetary funds; 2) creating an adequate social climate and 3) encouraging trust in the society. The hypotheses introduced are tested using the data on eleven countries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One important conclusion derived from these studies concerns the necessity of an institutional framework to explain how the entrepreneurial activity is configured in each location. This idea is also claimed by Bjørnskov and Foss (2013) and Nissan et al (2011), who find that institutions affect economic growth, specifically formal institutions, such as procedures or the time needed to create a new business, indicating that regulation can influence the context in which entrepreneurship affects economic growth. and Baumol and Strom (2007) discuss the importance of understanding how entrepreneurship is configured by taking into account culture, beliefs and social values, among other factors, to obtain the best understanding of the role of entrepreneurship in economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…One important conclusion derived from these studies concerns the necessity of an institutional framework to explain how the entrepreneurial activity is configured in each location. This idea is also claimed by Bjørnskov and Foss (2013) and Nissan et al (2011), who find that institutions affect economic growth, specifically formal institutions, such as procedures or the time needed to create a new business, indicating that regulation can influence the context in which entrepreneurship affects economic growth. and Baumol and Strom (2007) discuss the importance of understanding how entrepreneurship is configured by taking into account culture, beliefs and social values, among other factors, to obtain the best understanding of the role of entrepreneurship in economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Hence, institutional factors can be an accurate framework in which entrepreneurship and economic growth interact (Audretsch et al 2008). Some empirical evidence is presented by Bjørnskov and Foss (2013) and Nissan et al (2011), who find that legal institutions (procedures or the time to create a new business) affect economic growth. Nevertheless, as Baumol and Strom (2007) and Keilbach (2004a, 2004b) have discussed, it is important to understand how entrepreneurship is configured by taking into account culture, beliefs, and social values, among other factors, to obtain the best understanding of the role of entrepreneurship in economic growth.…”
Section: Institutions Entrepreneurship and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation is now generally accepted as a critical parameter of human intelligence and cognitive capacities (Nissan et al 2011).…”
Section: Innovation and Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%