1990
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.53.4.331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between electrical and mechanical properties of motor units.

Abstract: In six healthy volunteers, the size of the motor unit action potential (MUAP) was related to its contractile behaviour. Electrical activity was determined by measuring amplitude and area of the potential, using the macro electromyography (EMG) technique. The mechanical response was characterised by contraction time, twitch force and relaxation time, recorded with the spike triggered averaging technique. With increasing tension of the whole muscle corresponding to an increasing threshold, the force of single un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with most of the previous data obtained on various human muscles (MilnerBrown et al 1973;Milner-Brown and Stein 1975;Stephens and Usherwood 1977;Goldberg and Derfler 1977;Monster and Chan 1977;Vogt et al 1990), the higher the motor unit recruitment threshold, the shorter the twitch rise time, the larger the twitch amplitude and the larger the macro-MUP area turned out to be (Tables 2, 3). The good correlation observed between twitch amplitude and twitch rise time confirms previous data obtained in another extensive study of the same muscle (Schmied et al 1994).…”
Section: Contribution Of the Ia Monosynaptic Inputs To The Motor Unitsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In line with most of the previous data obtained on various human muscles (MilnerBrown et al 1973;Milner-Brown and Stein 1975;Stephens and Usherwood 1977;Goldberg and Derfler 1977;Monster and Chan 1977;Vogt et al 1990), the higher the motor unit recruitment threshold, the shorter the twitch rise time, the larger the twitch amplitude and the larger the macro-MUP area turned out to be (Tables 2, 3). The good correlation observed between twitch amplitude and twitch rise time confirms previous data obtained in another extensive study of the same muscle (Schmied et al 1994).…”
Section: Contribution Of the Ia Monosynaptic Inputs To The Motor Unitsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast to our hypothesis of pain-induced inhibition, the number of units recruited during pain was larger compared to baseline, and at a speci®c external force level there was a tendency (P < 0.10) toward a larger amplitude of the concentric MUAPs during pain. These ®ndings could indicate a pain-induced shift toward lower rather than higher MU recruitment levels, since a relationship seems to exist between the MU amplitude obtained from the concentric needle and the size of the MU (Bauermeister and Jabre 1992;Vogt et al 1990). However, this interpretation is not supported since apart from the dierence in number of MUs, only a tendency to a dierence was found in the concentric MUAP apmplitude, and no eect was found on the MUAP area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…30 The MacroRep is produced by averaging the macro electromyogram (EMG), triggered by the firing of the SMU. 28 The strong relationship between MacroRep size and the twitch force of SMU in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) 6,7,34 shows that MacroRep gives a reliable indication of SMU size. Given the shortcomings of other techniques, MacroRep appears to be the procedure of choice for determining SMU size in the jaw muscles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%