2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1073/4/042040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emission signal-to-noise and hearing threshold change during methylprednisolone therapy for sudden deafness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Tuli mendadak adalah jenis tuli yang paling umum, yaitu 85-90% kasus mendadak dan sebagian besar (96-99%) hanya memengaruhi satu telinga. 3 Spain, steroid drugs are the treatment of choice for sudden deafness with an unknown etiology. Patients recovering from sudden deafness exhibit increasing otoacoustic emissions that begin prior to hearing improvement.…”
Section: Pendahuluanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Tuli mendadak adalah jenis tuli yang paling umum, yaitu 85-90% kasus mendadak dan sebagian besar (96-99%) hanya memengaruhi satu telinga. 3 Spain, steroid drugs are the treatment of choice for sudden deafness with an unknown etiology. Patients recovering from sudden deafness exhibit increasing otoacoustic emissions that begin prior to hearing improvement.…”
Section: Pendahuluanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Paling sering mengenai individu dalam kelompok usia 40-54 tahun. 3 Kejadian tahunan tuli mendadak di Taiwan 10,21 per 100.000 per tahun. 8 Prinsip pengobatan tuli mendadak adalah meningkatkan sirkulasi darah dan suplai oksigen ke dalam koklea.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The authors noted these findings may reveal a greater impairment of cochlear cells at the mid frequencies in comparison with the higher frequencies [32]. On the other hand, it was found that the hearing improvement rate significantly correlated with DPOAE amplitudes at the f2 frequencies 3031 and 4812 Hz, but not at other f2 frequencies measured [24].…”
Section: Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Chao and Chen [16,17] recognized that a PTA from 250 to 4000 Hz of greater than or equal to 65 dB was associated with a poorer hearing prognosis; however, they noted duration from onset to treatment could not be ruled out as a confounding factor [24,26]. Schweinfurth et al noted an average improvement of 33 dB in the PTA from 500 to 2000 Hz in conjunction with steroid therapy, which was also associated with intact DPOAEs [27].…”
Section: Pure Tone Audiometrymentioning
confidence: 99%