2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between variations in the lake bacterioplankton abundance and the lake trophic state: Evidence from the 20-year monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the South Korean reservoirs, inter-relations between physical, chemical and biological factors including total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total suspended solids, Secchi disk depth and for lake eutrophication management (Zou et al, 2020). The relationships between trophic states and their driving factors were investigated such as determination of the spatial and temporal variations in trophic state and identify potential causes for these variations in 60 Korean reservoirs (Mamun et al, 2020), reservoir trophic states varied with environmental and water quality variables (Liu et al, 2017), the differences in algae functional group characteristics in the different water bodies in the region were identified water temperature and nutritional states (Lu et al, 2018), relations between variations in the lake bacterioplankton abundance and the lake trophic state (Adamovich et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the South Korean reservoirs, inter-relations between physical, chemical and biological factors including total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total suspended solids, Secchi disk depth and for lake eutrophication management (Zou et al, 2020). The relationships between trophic states and their driving factors were investigated such as determination of the spatial and temporal variations in trophic state and identify potential causes for these variations in 60 Korean reservoirs (Mamun et al, 2020), reservoir trophic states varied with environmental and water quality variables (Liu et al, 2017), the differences in algae functional group characteristics in the different water bodies in the region were identified water temperature and nutritional states (Lu et al, 2018), relations between variations in the lake bacterioplankton abundance and the lake trophic state (Adamovich et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient concentrations and ratios, in addition to other abiotic environmental factors, are crucial for bacterial succession (Fraser et al 2018; Kirchman et al 2017; Paver and Kent 2017; Tang et al 2017). Bacterial biomass positively correlates with the trophic status of the lakes (Scofield et al 2015) but does not correlate with the chlorophyll level (Adamovich et al 2019). Abiotic factors invariably serve as restriction factors for bacterial communities as each bacterial taxon has optimal, minimal and maximal environmental conditions (temperature, TP and TN concentration) (Scofield et al 2015), and fluctuations in the abiotic environmental conditions result in a succession of bacteria (Luria et al 2017; Paver and Kent 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the widespread application of molecular biological techniques, studies on the species composition of bacterial communities have shaped by both biotic communities (Berry et al 2017; Camarena-Gómez et al 2018) and abiotic environmental factors (Fraser et al 2018; Scofield et al 2015). For example, in lakes, both phytoplankton biomass (Luria et al 2017) and physicochemical environmental conditions (Adamovich et al 2019; Liu et al 2015) influence the species composition of bacterial communities. Understanding the response of bacterial communities to the seasonal changes of the abiotic environment, including changes in the phytoplankton species composition, are necessary to understand changes in species composition or the functional roles of the bacterial communities in lakes (Gilbert et al 2012; Luria et al 2017; Paver and Kent 2017; Yannarell and Triplett 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Структура бактериопланктона и бактериобентоса является важным показателем для оценки степени загрязненности любого водоема. Исследование отдельных диагностических групп микроорганизмов в составе бактериопланктона и бактериобентоса позволяет оценить состояние и прогнозировать развитие экосистемы озера [Дзюбан и др., 2005;РД 52.24.309-2016;Adamovich et al, 2019]. Среди многообразия микроорганизмов, осуществляющих процессы деструкции в воде и донных отложениях водных объектов, выделяют два основных показателя -это общее число бактерий и численность сапрофитных бактерий, а также их соотношение.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified