1950
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1950.00021962004200120006x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation of Moisture Equivalent to Field Capacity and Moisture Retained at 15 Atmospheres Pressure to the Wilting Percentage1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil moisture studies reported here involved sampling the upper 5 or 10 dm of the mineral soil profiles to determine water contents of each decimeter horizon, and then evaluating these in terms of wilting coefficients and field capacities. Peele and Beale's (1950) method was used for calculating approximate field capacities from the moisture equivalent : field .capacity = 2.62 + ( moisture equivalent X 0.865). Wilting coefficients were determined directly using mixtures of sunflower and wheat (Daubenmire 1959).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil moisture studies reported here involved sampling the upper 5 or 10 dm of the mineral soil profiles to determine water contents of each decimeter horizon, and then evaluating these in terms of wilting coefficients and field capacities. Peele and Beale's (1950) method was used for calculating approximate field capacities from the moisture equivalent : field .capacity = 2.62 + ( moisture equivalent X 0.865). Wilting coefficients were determined directly using mixtures of sunflower and wheat (Daubenmire 1959).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to predict field-capacity values of humid-region soils from Puerto Rico on a basis of clay percentages were successful, but failed when dealing with arid-and semiarid-region soils (3). Other investigators have presented data relating moisture equivalents to field capacities for South Carolina soils (5). Moisture equivalents can be obtained easily and accurately under controlled laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic data obtained in this study were gravimetric determinations of the water content of soils collected by decimeter-depth horizons with a closed-tube type of sampler or a slender orchard-type auger. These data were then evaluated against wilting coefficients determined directly with mixed cultures of wheat and sunflowers grown in tumblers in a water bath, and field capacities estimated by adjustment of moisture-equivalent values (Peele and Beale 1950). METHODS Eight sites were selected that were approximately modal in their expression of the character of a major type of steppe vegetation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%