1995
DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(95)91341-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between size of skin excision, wound, and specimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
80
3
Order By: Relevance
“…39 We focused instead on the number of MMS layers because layers were uniform, were less dependent on preoperative size, and could be compared between sites more consistently than postoperative size. 17 Because our study focused on cases from a single surgeon, there was consistency in technique. For tumors of larger size or aggressive histologic type, where classic teaching recommends larger layers, this method actually underestimates subclinical spread such that any risk factors still identified are even less likely to be spurious.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39 We focused instead on the number of MMS layers because layers were uniform, were less dependent on preoperative size, and could be compared between sites more consistently than postoperative size. 17 Because our study focused on cases from a single surgeon, there was consistency in technique. For tumors of larger size or aggressive histologic type, where classic teaching recommends larger layers, this method actually underestimates subclinical spread such that any risk factors still identified are even less likely to be spurious.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative size was based on measurements of the largest diameter of each tumor taken using a millimeter ruler. Postoperative defects of MMS were also measured but were not used in the final analysis because previous studies 17 had demonstrated wide variability of tissue stretch in different anatomic locations. Preoperative size was analyzed according to the following categories: less than 5, 5 to 9, 10 to 14, 15 to 19, 20 to 24, and 25 mm and greater.…”
Section: Medical Chart Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some argument as to which steps in the tissue processing confer shrinkage and expansion but most studies support that the majority of the shrinkage occurs immediately after the biopsy procedure, probably due to contractile properties of the tissue and collapse of blood and lymph vessels, and that the subsequent formalin fixation and paraffin infusion actually expand the tissue somewhat. Thus, in spite of conflicting reports, most studies demonstrate an overall shrinkage of specimens following formalin fixation [17,18,39]. This issue is relevant for all quantitative in vitro studies of the skin and should be considered when interpreting the results of such studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ex vivo techniques based on microscopic visualization of tissue specimens following preparation have the advantage of high resolution and unlimited depth of imaging in skin samples. However, it is well known that the proportions of the tissue samples are distorted in the preparation process due to contraction of the skin following biopsy and in the process of dehydration and subsequent infiltration with paraffin of tissue samples for standard light microscopy [17,18,19]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this may waste normal tissue, and can also induce poor outcomes in both the wound length and direction, as the operator plans the length and the direction of the wound prior to excision. In the literature, it has been mentioned that significant differences among planned excisions, wounds, and specimen sizes can be influenced by the patient’s age and the lesion site and type [7]. In addition, as the formation of dog ears is affected by several factors – tissue dynamics, wound geometry, surface contours, and surgical technique [8,9,10]– it is not ideal to commit to sacrificing normal tissues before knowing the size and shape of wound defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%