1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-2896(15)30830-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relación del flujo espiratorio máximo con la exploración clínica y la gasometría arterial en la valoración de gravedad de la crisis asmática

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Alternatively, to provide a faster assessment of acute asthma, HCP must consider evaluating the clinical parameter of central cyanosis. Moreover, Fábregas et al 14 reported that the clinical parameter of cyanosis was more reliable to assess degree of airway obstruction than the assessment of use of respiratory muscles, pulse rate, or respiratory rate. The authors confirmed the condition of respiratory insufficiency by investigating the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2 ), which was significantly reduced in patients with PEF < 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 Alternatively, to provide a faster assessment of acute asthma, HCP must consider evaluating the clinical parameter of central cyanosis. Moreover, Fábregas et al 14 reported that the clinical parameter of cyanosis was more reliable to assess degree of airway obstruction than the assessment of use of respiratory muscles, pulse rate, or respiratory rate. The authors confirmed the condition of respiratory insufficiency by investigating the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2 ), which was significantly reduced in patients with PEF < 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PEF was evaluated for patients aged more than 5 years who were able to measure PEF (sub-item 6.1) effectively, and if they had limitations or were not available for PEF measurement, then persistence of central cyanosis (sub-item 6.2) was assessed. 14 The composite score range was 6-12 for BASS and 0-14 for WDFS. Higher scores indicated a higher degree of severity for asthma exacerbations.…”
Section: Acute Asthma Severity Assessment Scores and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%