2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45832-8_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relabelling in Graph Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin by briefly reviewing labelled graphs and the double-pushout approach to graph transformation with relabelling (see [7] for details).…”
Section: Attributed Graph Transformation Via Rule Schematamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We begin by briefly reviewing labelled graphs and the double-pushout approach to graph transformation with relabelling (see [7] for details).…”
Section: Attributed Graph Transformation Via Rule Schematamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote such a derivation by G ⇒ r,g H. The requirement that the pushouts in Figure 1 are natural ensures that the pushout complement D in Figure 1 is uniquely determined by rule r, graph G and morphism g [7,Theorem 1]. Figure 2(b) demonstrates that non-natural pushout complements need not be unique.…”
Section: Double-pushout Approach With Relabellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We review basic notions of the double-pushout approach to graph transformation, using a version that allows unlabelled nodes [12]. Rules with unlabelled nodes allow to relabel nodes and, in addition, represent sets of totally labelled rules because unlabelled nodes in the left-hand side act as placeholders for arbitrarily labelled nodes.…”
Section: Graphs Rules and Derivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12] it is shown that for rule r and injective morphism g given, there exists such a direct derivation if and only if g satisfies the dangling condition: no node in g(L) − g(K) must be incident to an edge in G − g(L). If this condition is satisfied, then r and g determine D and H uniquely up to isomorphim and H can be constructed (up to isomorphism) from G as follows: (1) Remove all nodes and edges in g(L) − g(K), obtaining a subgraph D ′ .…”
Section: Graphs Rules and Derivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%