2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcing effect of organoclay in nitrile rubber - Effect of mill mixing and latex stage mixing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the model fails to capture the nonlinear rise of the elastic modulus with increasing filler loading. This is congruent with other works [41], [56]. The reason for this behavior may be attributed to greater interaction between the matrix and the nanoclay at lower filler loading whereas nanoclay agglomerations increase at higher filler loadings, causing reduced adhesion between the matrix and the nanoclay [41].…”
Section: Ji Et Al Modelsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the model fails to capture the nonlinear rise of the elastic modulus with increasing filler loading. This is congruent with other works [41], [56]. The reason for this behavior may be attributed to greater interaction between the matrix and the nanoclay at lower filler loading whereas nanoclay agglomerations increase at higher filler loadings, causing reduced adhesion between the matrix and the nanoclay [41].…”
Section: Ji Et Al Modelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Modified Guth model: This model describes a progressive increasing on modulus similar to the experimental data, yet it tends to significantly overestimate the rubber clay nanocomposite modulus. Similar results have been seen in [28], [29], [41]. The modified Guth model assumes filler particles to be randomly orientated in the nanocomposite matrix.…”
Section: B Comparison Of Experimental Data and Theoretical Modelssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Selected quantities of blending recipes in parts per hundred-part of rubber (pphr) consisting of 100 pphr NBR latex, 1.0 pphr of ZnO and ZDEC each, 0.5 pphr ZMBT, GO loading varied as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 pphr, and lastly, 1.0 pphr sulphur was added into a beaker. The amount of compounding chemicals was chosen based on previous reported works on NBR latex film productions [ 34 , 35 ]. The compound was then stirred at a speed of 350 rpm for 30 min with IKA overhead stirrer model EUROSTAR Digital 20 supplied by IKA Works Asia, Rawang, Selangor, Malaysia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfur was added lastly to the compound and the loading of sulfur was varied as 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 phr. The ratio of compounding ingredients is selected based on the literature review where the common loading of accelerators, activators and crosslinking agents in NBR films was adapted [35,36]. At the same time as the ingredients were added, the compound was stirred using IKA overhead stirrer model EUROSTAR Digital 20 supplied by IKA Works Asia Sdn.…”
Section: Preparation Of Nbr/go Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%