1999
DOI: 10.1080/07055900.1999.9649621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitation and analysis of Canadian daily precipitation time series

Abstract: The goal of this project was to develop adjustment procedures to use daily resolution data to generate high quality time series of precipitation and to perform regional trend analyses on the resulting datasets. A total of 69 locations, most with data covering the period 1900-96 were used. Data availability in much of the Canadian Arctic was restricted to 1948-96. By using daily data, improved corrections to precipitation data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
196
0
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
196
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary remaining source of reduced river discharge is reduced precipitation. However, increases have been found in observed precipitation for these regions of Canada for annual [Groisman and Easterling, 1994] and seasonal [Mekis and Hogg, 1999] time periods, although these studies use longer time periods covering 50 to 100 year periods which are not directly comparable to the 30 year period in this study. Additionally, precipitation data are well known to contain large errors which tend to be downward biased especially in winter [Groisman and Easterling, 1994].…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of the Gagesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The primary remaining source of reduced river discharge is reduced precipitation. However, increases have been found in observed precipitation for these regions of Canada for annual [Groisman and Easterling, 1994] and seasonal [Mekis and Hogg, 1999] time periods, although these studies use longer time periods covering 50 to 100 year periods which are not directly comparable to the 30 year period in this study. Additionally, precipitation data are well known to contain large errors which tend to be downward biased especially in winter [Groisman and Easterling, 1994].…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of the Gagesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The stations' data is provided by Environment Canada and have been adjusted for possible bias due to winds, wetting losses, evaporation, etc. (Mekis and Hogg, 1999, for a description of the adjustment method). Data were available for the period from 1900 to 2007 for the more densely urbanized parts of Canada (essentially the southern regions), while they covered the 1950-2007 period for the other regions.…”
Section: Available Simulation Series and Observed Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary climatic variables, including minimum, mean, and maximum monthly temperature [42] and total monthly precipitation [43], were obtained from the nearest meteorological station (Brandon Agriculture Station which is located 88.5 km from the study site) for the period of 1895-1999. The primary monthly meteorological data were converted into a secondary, synthetic variable that measures net water availability which is referred to as a moisture index.…”
Section: Climate Datamentioning
confidence: 99%