2010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003979.pub3
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Rehabilitation after surgery for flexor tendon injuries in the hand

Abstract: Controlled mobilisation regimens are widely employed in rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair in the hand. This review found insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials to define the best mobilisation strategy.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
10
4
4
0

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

Range
2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
14
2

Relationship

0
16

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 16 publications

(15 citation statements)
references

References 31 publications

0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Riaz et al 3 who has also evaluated using Kleinert methods on his prospective comparative study and found that 75% digits were graded excellent using AASH scoring. According to Thien et al 18 on his meta-analyses using 6 RCT, there were no significant difference between the comparison on early active motion, Continuous Passive Motion (CPM), Kleinert and Duran protocol. He also stated that early mobilization protocol is well accepted in flexor tendon injury, yet the best regiment has not been concluded.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Riaz et al 3 avaliaram o uso do método Kleinert em seu estudo comparativo prospectivo e descobriram que 75% dos dígitos foram classificados como excelentes usando a pontuação AASH. De acordo com Thien et al 18 em suas metanálises utilizando 6 ECR, não houve diferença significativa entre a comparação do movimento ativo precoce, movimento passivo contínuo (CPM), protocolo Kleinert e Duran. Ele também afirmou que o protocolo de mobilização precoce é bem aceito na lesão do tendão flexor, mas o melhor regimento ainda não foi concluído.…”
Section: Discussion
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation