Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective

Abstract

Nanotechnology and more particularly nanotechnology-based products and materials have provided a huge potential for novel solutions to many of the current challenges society is facing. However, nanotechnology is also an area of product innovation that is sometimes developing faster than regulatory frameworks. This is due to the high complexity of some nanomaterials, the lack of a globally harmonised regulatory definition and the different scopes of regulation at a global level. Research organisations and regulatory bodies have spent many efforts in the last two decades to cope with these challenges. Although there has been a significant advancement related to analytical approaches for labelling purposes as well as to the development of suitable test guidelines for nanomaterials and their safety assessment, there is a still a need for greater global collaboration and consensus in the regulatory field. Furthermore, with growing societal concerns on plastic litter and tiny debris produced by degradation of littered plastic objects, the impact of micro- and nanoplastics on humans and the environment is an emerging issue. Despite increasing research and initial regulatory discussions on micro- and nanoplastics, there are still knowledge gaps and thus an urgent need for action. As nanoplastics can be classified as a specific type of incidental nanomaterials, current and future scientific investigations should take into account the existing profound knowledge on nanotechnology/nanomaterials when discussing issues around nanoplastics. This review was conceived at the 2019 Global Summit on Regulatory Sciences that took place in Stresa, Italy, on 24–26 September 2019 (GSRS 2019) and which was co-organised by the Global Coalition for Regulatory Science Research (GCRSR) and the European Commission's (EC) Joint Research Centre (JRC). The GCRSR consists of regulatory bodies from various countries around the globe including EU bodies. The 2019 Global Summit provided an excellent platform to exchange the latest information on activities carried out by regulatory bodies with a focus on the application of nanotechnology in the agriculture/food sector, on nanoplastics and on nanomedicines, including taking stock and promoting further collaboration. Recently, the topic of micro- and nanoplastics has become a new focus of the GCRSR. Besides discussing the challenges and needs, some future directions on how new tools and methodologies can improve the regulatory science were elaborated by summarising a significant portion of discussions during the summit. It has been revealed that there are still some uncertainties and knowledge gaps with regard to physicochemical properties, environmental behaviour and toxicological effects, especially as testing described in the dossiers is often done early in the product development process, and the material in the final product may behave differently. The harmonisation of methodologies for quantification and risk assessment of nanomaterials and micro/nanoplastics, the documentation...

Nanomaterials in the Management of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

“…The safety assessment of medical devices containing or deriving from nanotechnology is carried out by the US-FDA's Centre for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), housing a Nanotechnology Regulatory Science Research Programme that is based on three pillars: physicochemical characterization methods, in vitro and in vivo models, and (toxicological) risk assessment [136,137]. The types of devices that incorporate nanotechnology include antimicrobial, dental, orthopaedic, neurological, and combination devices and in vitro diagnostic tools.…”

“…It is important to know whether NPs affect the accuracy and/or reliability of standard biocompatibility or toxicity test assays, such as cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Because of the vast number of sizes, shapes, and chemistry of nanomaterials, there is the need for the development of in vitro models (2D, 3D, organ on a chip, organoids) and in silico models in order to predict human responses and improve in vitro to in vivo extrapolations [137].…”

Autorregulación y empresas ciudadanas: cartilla de lineamientos legales para emprendedores que trabajan con nanotecnología

“…Debido a esta variabilidad basada en los materiales, hoy en día la ciencia se enfrenta a vacíos de conocimiento sobre el destino y el comportamiento de los materiales de nano ingeniería en los sistemas de prueba y el medio ambiente (Gottschalk, Kost y Nowack, 2013). Por tanto, la nanotecnología y los nanomateriales tienen asociadas impredecibles consecuencias, especialmente en lo que se refiere a sus impactos negativos (Allan et al, 2021), plantean un desafío a la ley (Giusti et al, 2019), pues es necesario regular estas nuevas tecnologías a fin de prevenir violaciones de derechos, y aun así, seguirlas según las metas de desarrollo sostenible, propuestos por la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) hasta 2030.…”

In vitro modeling for the aging of nanoplastics: physicochemical characteristics and effect on the biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus

“…However, plastic end-products include other additives (e.g., stabilizers, pigments) that signi cantly in uence their behavior (sorption, degradation, etc.) (Allan et al 2021;Ateia et al 2020;Saygin and Baysal 2020a-d). As a result, end-product plastics rather than pure material are more representative to understand their actions on human health.…”

“…Nowadays, plastics are an emerging global problem because they are considered to be the most widely used industrial products, and they are routinely released into the environment in either direct or indirect ways (Saygin and Baysal 2020a). These plastic particles (or items/debris) are synthetic organic polymer particles and depending on their size, shape, or color, they can be classi ed as micro-(5 mm to 1 µm), submicron-(1 µm to 100 nm), and nano-(< 100 nm) plastics (Bradney et al 2019;Baysal et al 2020;Allan et al 2021). Moreover, these plastic particles are grouped as primary and secondary plastic particles.…”