2021
DOI: 10.1108/ijoem-08-2020-0870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory focus and construal level theory on low-income consumer indebtedness: Evidence from an emerging market

Abstract: PurposeThis study aims to further analyse the decision-making process of low-income consumer from an emerging market by verifying the influence of regulatory focus and construal level theory on indebtedness.Design/methodology/approachAn experimental study was carried out with a design 2 (regulatory focus: promotion vs prevention) × 2 (psychological distance: high vs low) between subjects, with 140 low-income consumers.FindingsOur study points out that the propensity towards indebtedness of low-income consumer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulatory focus can also be understood as one's pursuit of their ideals or duties (Zou & Chan, 2019). Promotion-focused subjects try to achieve their ideals, translated into dreams, aspirations and achievements, and are motivated to approach gains (Campos and Costa, 2021). In turn, prevention-focused subjects aim to fulfill their duties, which are understood as obligations and responsibilities, and feel motivated to change away from losses (Chan & Ho, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory focus can also be understood as one's pursuit of their ideals or duties (Zou & Chan, 2019). Promotion-focused subjects try to achieve their ideals, translated into dreams, aspirations and achievements, and are motivated to approach gains (Campos and Costa, 2021). In turn, prevention-focused subjects aim to fulfill their duties, which are understood as obligations and responsibilities, and feel motivated to change away from losses (Chan & Ho, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%