1968
DOI: 10.1176/ps.19.2.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating Operant-Conditioning Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is despite the fact that the three theoretical orientations posit vastly different conceptions of the importance of "relationship" to their practitioners' effectiveness. Thus, not only does there appear to be a considerable gap between theory and practice in the area of relationship, but this study also suggests that criticisms regarding the presumed coldness and inhumaneness of certain groups of practitioners such as the behaviorists, merely because of their theoretical orientation (Lucero, Vail, & Scherber, 1968;Murray, 1963;Patterson, 1963;Shoben, 1963), may be unfounded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This is despite the fact that the three theoretical orientations posit vastly different conceptions of the importance of "relationship" to their practitioners' effectiveness. Thus, not only does there appear to be a considerable gap between theory and practice in the area of relationship, but this study also suggests that criticisms regarding the presumed coldness and inhumaneness of certain groups of practitioners such as the behaviorists, merely because of their theoretical orientation (Lucero, Vail, & Scherber, 1968;Murray, 1963;Patterson, 1963;Shoben, 1963), may be unfounded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While behavior principles and application procedures using such principles are neutral, i.e. neither inherently "good" or "bad," there are conce~s about providing teachers with instruction in the implementation of behavior principles ( Lucero, Vail, and Scherber, · 1968;Wood, 1968 ). These concerns may actually reflect ambivalence regarding the ethical aspects of providing teachers with powerful behavior change procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%