2003
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/58.11.m1036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regular Visitors Are Not Good Substitutes for Assessment of Elderly Patient Satisfaction With Nursing Home Care and Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, recall bias and non-response bias may be concerns when using consumer surveys although the Maryland nursing home family care experience surveys achieved consistently high response rates over years. 28,29 Third, our multivariate analyses comparing care experience scores over facility groups relied largely on cross-sectional identification of ownership types, and we cannot totally rule out bias due to unobserved factors that are correlated with both chain ownership and the outcomes. For example, Culture Changes, which were more likely to be implemented in nonprofit and in independent facilities, were found to have impacted clinical outcomes, quality of care, quality of life, and other resident and staff outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, recall bias and non-response bias may be concerns when using consumer surveys although the Maryland nursing home family care experience surveys achieved consistently high response rates over years. 28,29 Third, our multivariate analyses comparing care experience scores over facility groups relied largely on cross-sectional identification of ownership types, and we cannot totally rule out bias due to unobserved factors that are correlated with both chain ownership and the outcomes. For example, Culture Changes, which were more likely to be implemented in nonprofit and in independent facilities, were found to have impacted clinical outcomes, quality of care, quality of life, and other resident and staff outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure ranges from 0 to 1, with scores of 0 indicating no agreement beyond chance alone. Excellent, good, moderate, and poor agreement scores are at levels of >0.80, 0.80–0.60, 0.41–0.59, and <= 0.4, respectively (Gasquet et al, 2003). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(32,33) Thus, although family member surveys are an alternative and easily used source of satisfaction information, they should not, in general, substitute for direct surveys of nursing home residents. In the future states might consider collecting data from both residents and their family members, as well as collecting separate data for short-term and long-term residents because of the differences in their care needs and expected outcomes.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%