1988
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.124.3.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regressing atypical histiocytosis: the controversy continues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[61][62][63][64][65] However, findings of MFH-specific genomic alterations 66 -68 and gene expression profiles 69 -71 indicate that diagnosis of UPS/MFH corresponds to a distinct nosological entity and may reflect development of these neoplasms from MSC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[61][62][63][64][65] However, findings of MFH-specific genomic alterations 66 -68 and gene expression profiles 69 -71 indicate that diagnosis of UPS/MFH corresponds to a distinct nosological entity and may reflect development of these neoplasms from MSC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%