2017
DOI: 10.1177/1745691617693624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: In an anonymous 4-person economic game, participants contributed more money to a common project (i.e., cooperated) when required to decide quickly than when forced to delay their decision (Rand, Greene & Nowak, 2012), a pattern consistent with the social heuristics hypothesis proposed by Rand and colleagues. The results of studies using time pressure have been mixed, with some replication attempts observing similar patterns (e.g., and others observing null effects (e.g., Tinghög et al., 2013;Verkoeijen & Bouw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
160
3
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
10
160
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Tinghög et al (2013) could not successfully replicate Rand et al's (2012) results without exclusions and therefore conclude the original findings were "an artefact of excluding the about 50% of subjects who failed to respond on time" (p.427). Consistent with this possibility, a recent pre-registered multisite replication study (Bouwmeester et al, 2017) reported that two-thirds of participants failed to make decisions within the allotted time and that the effect of time pressure on cooperation was only present when excluding such individuals. Of course, this data is also consistent with the possibility that individuals who fail to conform to the time-pressure treatment therefore show no effect of that treatment.…”
Section: Methodsological Challenges For Intuitive Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Tinghög et al (2013) could not successfully replicate Rand et al's (2012) results without exclusions and therefore conclude the original findings were "an artefact of excluding the about 50% of subjects who failed to respond on time" (p.427). Consistent with this possibility, a recent pre-registered multisite replication study (Bouwmeester et al, 2017) reported that two-thirds of participants failed to make decisions within the allotted time and that the effect of time pressure on cooperation was only present when excluding such individuals. Of course, this data is also consistent with the possibility that individuals who fail to conform to the time-pressure treatment therefore show no effect of that treatment.…”
Section: Methodsological Challenges For Intuitive Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is one feature that differentiates our work from previous studies (e.g. Bouwmeester et al, 2017) and it would be preferable in future work for a full non-deception procedure to be implemented. Second, while we had sufficient power to moderately sized main effects, and also to detect the potential elimination of the "intuitive cooperation" effect in the critical cells of our design, we had weak statistical power to detect moderate two-interactions among variables, and insufficient statistical power to reliably detect moderate three-way interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many-to-one replication research is a nascent, but rapidly expanding, field: we are aware of at least 79 completed and 55 ongoing many-to-one replication studies to date, all completed or initiated since 2014 and in experimental psychology and experimental philosophy alone (completed: Klein et al (2014); Ebersole et al (2016); Schweinsberg et al (2016); Cova, F., et al (2018); Alogna et al (2014); Eerland et al (2016); Hagger et al (2016); Cheung et al (2016); E.-J. Wagenmakers et al (2016); Bouwmeester et al (2017); ongoing: Association for Psychological Science (2018); Schweinsberg & Uhlmann (2018); Klein, R.A., et al (2018); Ebersole, C.R., et al (2018)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%