Regional media framing of the Confederate flag debate in South Carolina

Abstract

Content analysis of 400 news stories in three South Carolina newspapers examines the frames used about the Confederate flag debate in the first 25 days after the 2015 Charleston church massacre. Stories focused on the legislative process in removing the flag more than the flag's symbolic meaning or the shootings. The three newspapers cited reasons to support removal nearly three times more often than reasons to oppose and showed some distinct regional differences. About two thirds of stories in Charleston and Columbia had a favorable tone (support) toward flag removal, whereas the Greenville newspaper coverage was largely neutral.

“Hidden” No More: Newspapers’ Framing of NASA Mathematician Katherine Johnson

“…How journalists convey or “frame” events, people, places, etc. help the mass news consuming audience understand their own communities and the wider world (e.g., Entman, 2004; Frear et al, 2019; Hoewe & Zeldes, 2012). In many circumstances, journalists’ words, images, and videos hold added salience for their audiences if the audience members’ lack direct knowledge of the news topic (e.g., Tirosh et al, 2022).…”

Nationalizing the “refugee crisis”: A comparative analysis exploring how elite newspapers in four countries framed forced migration during World Refugee Day

“…Forced migration and the refugee crisis have been among the most pressing issues of recent years, often stirring intense debate and contributing to political polarization. Media frames can influence how audiences evaluate issues lying at the heart of such public debates (Frear et al, 2019). They tend to increase in importance when news media coverage centers around an ongoing crisis, since specific frames help people understand novel, complex situations (Terracina-Hartman, 2020).…”