1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01286115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional input-output multipliers without a full I-O table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variance can be measured either through simulation techniques as provided in Burford and Katz [4] or through the actual theoretical derivation of the variance. Generally, simulations of the variance for the various shortcut formulas show them to be extremely small, which points out the relative insensitivity of input-output multipliers to the unknown matrix information.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variance can be measured either through simulation techniques as provided in Burford and Katz [4] or through the actual theoretical derivation of the variance. Generally, simulations of the variance for the various shortcut formulas show them to be extremely small, which points out the relative insensitivity of input-output multipliers to the unknown matrix information.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, by following an approach due to Drake, shortcut formulas were derived for the output, direct indirect income, total and direct indirect induced income multipliers as follows [4]:…”
Section: Notation and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method was used by BURFORD and KATZ (1977;pp.21-38). They showed that the output multipliers were primarily determined by the column sums of the A matrix.…”
Section: Coefficient Sum and Means Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of papers have examined some of the characteristics of the input-output model, and some of the conventions and practices followed in the preparation of input-output tables. A short and non-exhaustive list of these would include the effects of aggregation (for example Doekson and Little [5] and Hewings [I0]), the problem of reconciliation of row and column estimates (Gerking [9], Jensen and McGaurr [12], Miernyk [14]), uncertainty in technical coefficients (Gerking [8]), the distinction between price change and 'real' multiplier effects (Lee and Sehluter [13]), the relationship between inputoutput and other research approaches (Bradley and Gander [I]), and possible alternative methods to obtain estimates of input-output multipliers (Davis [4], Drake [6], Miernyk [14], Burford and Katz [2]). These studies are timely in that they open for discussion new facets of the input-output technique, many of which have been taken for granted as acceptable by virtue of established practice, and remind analysts that procedural choices and operational decisions made during the compilation of tables may effect the analytical value and *Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%