2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0758-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regenerative Techniques for Neuraxial Back Pain: a Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2019 systematic review of regenerative studies identified 9 studies reporting on clinical outcomes from autologous biologic treatments for low back pain. 88 However, these were heterogenous in terms of both patient group and intervention, and only one randomised controlled trial (n = 58) was found. The trial authors reported small benefits of intradiscal platelet-rich plasma over 8 weeks with no long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Many Patients With Low Back Pain Are Still Receiving the mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2019 systematic review of regenerative studies identified 9 studies reporting on clinical outcomes from autologous biologic treatments for low back pain. 88 However, these were heterogenous in terms of both patient group and intervention, and only one randomised controlled trial (n = 58) was found. The trial authors reported small benefits of intradiscal platelet-rich plasma over 8 weeks with no long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Many Patients With Low Back Pain Are Still Receiving the mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pettine et al reported significant reductions in pain following BMAC use for patients with discogenic pain [47]. The principle caveat of these results is the scarcity of similar results demonstrated in the literature [48].…”
Section: Spondylosismentioning
confidence: 98%