2017
DOI: 10.1002/phar.1940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regadenoson versus Dipyridamole: A Comparison of the Frequency of Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Abstract: Dipyridamole was associated with fewer adverse events than regadenoson in patients undergoing MPI. Dipyridamole offers a safe and cost-effective alternative to regadenoson for cardiac imaging studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two most common symptoms in the regadenoson group were headache (29%) and dyspnea (27%). Dyspnea was also present in the regadenoson group of our study (15%), but it was completely absent in the dipyridamole group, although there are also other studies that report the symptom of dyspnea in low percentages in dipyridamole-stressed patients [11,12]. Unlike regadenoson vs. adenosine studies, those that compare regadenoson to dipyridamole are limited.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two most common symptoms in the regadenoson group were headache (29%) and dyspnea (27%). Dyspnea was also present in the regadenoson group of our study (15%), but it was completely absent in the dipyridamole group, although there are also other studies that report the symptom of dyspnea in low percentages in dipyridamole-stressed patients [11,12]. Unlike regadenoson vs. adenosine studies, those that compare regadenoson to dipyridamole are limited.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Unlike regadenoson vs. adenosine studies, those that compare regadenoson to dipyridamole are limited. In a retrospective study by Amer et al [11] of 568 patients, half of whom were subjected to pharmacologic stress with regadenoson and the rest with dipyridamole, it was reported that significantly more patients experienced adverse reactions when they were stressed with regadenoson (84.9 vs. 56.7%; P < 0.001) with no significant differences in aminophylline administration ( P > 0.05). Although initially, our findings were similar for the frequency of adverse reactions (53 vs. 36%; P = 0.023), after performing multiple regression analyses and adjusting for multiple variables, the differences in the frequency of adverse reactions were no longer significant (OR = 1.96; 95% CI, 0.88–3.25; P = 0.114).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that while most centers in this study preferred regadenoson, other real-world studies with regadenoson as a comparator have demonstrated that adenosine is less expensive and results in fewer adverse events due to its short half-life; similar results have been seen for dipyridamole. 5,6 Regadenoson administration was considered ''not at all complex'' by a majority of nuclear imaging center staff, who further benefited with respect to reductions in total staff time for each step of the conversion process relative to adenosine and dipyridamole. Compared to adenosine and dipyridamole, use of regadenoson required less nuclear imaging center staff time, which may be due to its convenient administration and rapid onset of action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that while most centers in this study preferred regadenoson, other real-world studies with regadenoson as a comparator have demonstrated that adenosine is less expensive and results in fewer adverse events due to its short half-life; similar results have been seen for dipyridamole. 5 , 6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%