“…Unlike the guidelines concerning resettlement of refugees in a country of asylum, the distinct character of each form of repatriation is not clear and host countries have the freedom to decide how to implement such strategies (Chimni, 2004;Ighodaro, 2002;Zieck, 2004). Although the UNHCR principles of return in safety and dignity are still in place, the ideal of voluntary repatriation is much less clear (Chimni, 2004;Gerver, 2015;Ighodaro, 2002;Stefansson, 2004). Specifically, "the objectivism that characterizes the concept of 'safe return' disenfranchises refugees by eliminating their voice in the process leading to the decision to deny or terminate protection" (Chimni, 2003, p. 203).…”