2020
DOI: 10.1177/1359183520959387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections in shadow: Excavating the personal archives of Paul Jacobsthal and EM Jope

Abstract: The formation of archives has been a key facet of the archaeological discipline since its inception, critical in the production of knowledge from the destructive excavation that occurs in the field. The ongoing ‘archival shift’ within the humanities from archives as mere sources of secondary information to primary topics of research has presented new potential for the study of historic archaeological archives. This article explores the personal archives of two great scholars of Iron Age Celtic art, Paul Jacobs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both of the examples I examine here -archives from the Syrian archaeological sites of Palmyra and Dura-Europos -that is the case, with the archives being secondary to the "real" material, the archaeological objects. Indeed, 'archaeological archives' is broadly a category which has been retrospectively invented, in part to deal with backlogged field data, although recent years have seen a shift in attention towards archaeological archives as a subject in their own right (Baird and McFadyen 2014;Riggs 2017;Hitchcock 2020;Ward 2022). Nonetheless, this status of archaeological records as secondary is one that should probably worry us, one among many crises to do with the storage of the vast amount of archaeological 'stuff' the discipline generates (Brusius, Singh, and Kersel 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both of the examples I examine here -archives from the Syrian archaeological sites of Palmyra and Dura-Europos -that is the case, with the archives being secondary to the "real" material, the archaeological objects. Indeed, 'archaeological archives' is broadly a category which has been retrospectively invented, in part to deal with backlogged field data, although recent years have seen a shift in attention towards archaeological archives as a subject in their own right (Baird and McFadyen 2014;Riggs 2017;Hitchcock 2020;Ward 2022). Nonetheless, this status of archaeological records as secondary is one that should probably worry us, one among many crises to do with the storage of the vast amount of archaeological 'stuff' the discipline generates (Brusius, Singh, and Kersel 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El trabajo con museos locales y sus colecciones es una tarea fundamental dentro de la arqueología actual. Esta línea de investigación denominada arqueología de los museos o de los depósitos consiste en "excavar" en busca de nueva información en los museos y sus archivos (Baird y McFadyen, 2014;Hitchcock, 2021;Hicks y Stevenson, 2013;Lindskoug, 2019;Wingfield, 2018). Esto implica realizar tareas de manejo de colecciones, conservación, y a veces digitalización de todos estos acervos.…”
unclassified