2018
DOI: 10.1177/2514848618776864
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflecting on neoliberal natures: An exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, this suggests that the search for land-based negative emissions, be they in biofuel production for BECCS or for forest conservation and other "natural climate solutions," risks deepening economic inequality if lessons from past experiences are not taken seriously. First, land-based removal might allow for continued resource exploitation, fossil fuel-based production and wanton consumption in the global North, while creating exclusions and restricting development opportunities in some of the poorest areas of the global South (Bigger et al, 2018;Lohmann, 2008). Second, if ineffective, the likely mitigation deterrence (Carton, 2019;Markusson et al, 2018) of negative emission promises would lead to a global carbon budget overshoot and higher global warming that will have disproportionate negative impacts on the poorest regions of the world.…”
Section: Justice and Ethics In The Uneven Geographies Of Carbon Remmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, this suggests that the search for land-based negative emissions, be they in biofuel production for BECCS or for forest conservation and other "natural climate solutions," risks deepening economic inequality if lessons from past experiences are not taken seriously. First, land-based removal might allow for continued resource exploitation, fossil fuel-based production and wanton consumption in the global North, while creating exclusions and restricting development opportunities in some of the poorest areas of the global South (Bigger et al, 2018;Lohmann, 2008). Second, if ineffective, the likely mitigation deterrence (Carton, 2019;Markusson et al, 2018) of negative emission promises would lead to a global carbon budget overshoot and higher global warming that will have disproportionate negative impacts on the poorest regions of the world.…”
Section: Justice and Ethics In The Uneven Geographies Of Carbon Remmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leveraging of carbon assets for debt and the creation of interest-bearing capital is directly supported by international financial institutions, such as the World Bank, that provide loans for firms and governments on the basis of protecting nature. This is evidence of Wall Street Consensus policies penetrating "green" development strategies, which some call the neoliberalisation of nature (Bigger et al 2018) or financialisation of nature (Ouma et al 2018). 7 For a provocative discussion on the role of borders in capitalism, see Mezzadra and Neilson (2013).…”
Section: The Finance-extraction-transitions Nexus and The Geographies...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the central importance of green-blue space as a haven especially during the global Covid-19 pandemic (Pouso et al, 2021), sits alongside contemporary wetland use shaped by wider cuts to housing, mental health provision and youth services. Pro-environmental behaviours can only be supported once the impact of these 'Neoliberal natures' (Bigger et al, 2018) are acknowledged and addressed.…”
Section: Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%