2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2016.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference field specification and preliminary beam selection strategy for accelerator-based GCR simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several strategies have been proposed to use the GCR simulator for reproducing space radiation fields in different scenarios. Details can be found in (Slaba et al, 2016;Kim et al, 2015) while a general review of the project including its impact on the NSRL scientific program is presented in (Kim et al, 2015).…”
Section: Spe and Gcr Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several strategies have been proposed to use the GCR simulator for reproducing space radiation fields in different scenarios. Details can be found in (Slaba et al, 2016;Kim et al, 2015) while a general review of the project including its impact on the NSRL scientific program is presented in (Kim et al, 2015).…”
Section: Spe and Gcr Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the GCRSim offers the possibility to deliver a custom mix of ions and energies within the available choices, two reference fields have been defined (Slaba et al, 2016). One approach (referred to as external field) approximates the external, free space GCR spectrum with discrete ions and energy beams and deliver them onto a shielding material placed in front of the sample.…”
Section: Spe and Gcr Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GCRs consist of 85% low LET protons, 14% helium ions, and 1% HZE particles (Bourdarie and Xapsos 2008). However, HZE particles such as oxygen and iron, will make up 21% of the estimated ionizing dose equivalent from GCR exposure during deep space travel (Slaba, et al 2015). The estimated ionizing dose equivalent of a three-year Mars mission is 40 cGy (1.07 Sv absorbed dose) (Barcellus-Hoff, et al 2015, Cucinotta and Durante 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%