2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2006.282538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redundancy Resolution With Multiple Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GPM solves the inverse kinematics problem at the velocity level and can only deal with performance criteria defined at the position level. Besides, many other performance criteria such as velocity limit avoidance, peak torque avoidance, obstacle avoidance, mathematical singularity avoidance and energy minimization can be selected (Kapoor et al 1998 ;Lee & Buss 2006). Redundancy resolution can be at different levels, like joint displacements, velocities, acceleration or torques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPM solves the inverse kinematics problem at the velocity level and can only deal with performance criteria defined at the position level. Besides, many other performance criteria such as velocity limit avoidance, peak torque avoidance, obstacle avoidance, mathematical singularity avoidance and energy minimization can be selected (Kapoor et al 1998 ;Lee & Buss 2006). Redundancy resolution can be at different levels, like joint displacements, velocities, acceleration or torques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical method consists of using the Moore-Penrose inverse matrix J ϩ (Liegeois, 1977) using the general solution: q ϭ J ϩ ẋ ϩ ␣(I Ϫ J ϩ J)ٌ⌽ with ٌ⌽ gradien to f⌽͑q͒ (3) where J ϩ ϭ J T (JJ T ) -1 denotes the pseudo inverse of J, I is the identity matrix, p⌽ is defined as the gradient of ⌽(q) and ␣ is the projection magnitude. This is constructed by aggregating the weighted criteria (Lee and Buss, 2006). It is defined by:…”
Section: Resolution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On account of the hierarchical control structure applied by GPM considering multiple constraints-based performance criteria, excellent works have been conducted to avoid or alleviate the difficulty of inaccurate coefficients for performance criteria. A nested GPM [9] and [10] is used to provide fixed scalar weighted value for each performance criterion intuitively. Owing to the lack of adaptability to the changing situations using the fixed weighted values, a redundancy-based approach [11] is presented for GPM to eliminate the negative effect by iteratively solving a system of linear equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%