2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.164802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Intrinsic Electron Emittance from Photocathodes Using Ordered Crystalline Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is known that surface treatments for metallic substrates play an important role in securing maximum QE of deposited photocathodes. Only limited literature is available on this topic [7][8][9] , but the consensus indicates benefits from electrochemically etching the surfaces to smoothen morphology (i.e. electropolishing) and further chemical passivation by exposing them to gases at elevated temperatures, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is known that surface treatments for metallic substrates play an important role in securing maximum QE of deposited photocathodes. Only limited literature is available on this topic [7][8][9] , but the consensus indicates benefits from electrochemically etching the surfaces to smoothen morphology (i.e. electropolishing) and further chemical passivation by exposing them to gases at elevated temperatures, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First and foremost, the photoemission simulations do not include the matrix element describing the optical excitation of the electrons into the emitting 'virtual' states. This of course important for an Ab initio determination of the QE [24], but it is unlikely to affect the MTE evaluations from the simulated electron emission distributions unless the matrix element has a significant variation in momentum space for the excited virtual state. Second, the employed exact triangular barrier solution of Forbes and Deane [30] does not allow for the inclusion of the Schottky effect [15,16,35] in a formal manner.…”
Section: Photoemission Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…effective mass, m * ) and density of states variation affects, and can limit, the MTE of the emitted electrons through transverse momentum conservation in photoemission [22]. Together with the work function variation with crystal orientation [23], this is now leading to experimental investigations of the spectral emission properties of singlecrystal photocathodes [24][25][26][27] for which a functional theory [28] is required to aid our understanding of photoemission and, consequently, the selection of future high brightness (low MTE and high quantum efficiency (QE)) photocathode materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In state of the art photoemission electron sources, the cathode sets ultimate limits on achievable beam quality. Therefore lowering the intrinsic emittance is of vital importance in both the FEL and UED communities [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%