“…Despite the increasing availability of data and the associated advent of data-driven methods, tests of details remain firmly entrenched as the dominant accounting practice for obtaining audit evidence. Traditionally, a large amount of audit evidence was obtained from tests of details (Power, 1992), but in recent decades the growing availability of data has shifted the focus towards obtaining audit evidence from other analytical procedures (e.g., Appelbaum, Kogan, & Vasarhelyi, 2017;Boersma et al, 2020). However, adaptation of these ideas and technologies is only slowly permeating the audit practice (Gepp et al, 2018), and many audit firms still use some form of test of details to obtain audit evidence (Christensen, Elder, & Glover, 2015).…”