2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0393-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Diagnostic Errors through Effective Communication: Harnessing the Power of Information Technology

Abstract: Diagnostic errors are poorly understood despite being a frequent cause of medical errors. Recent efforts have aimed to advance the "basic science" of diagnostic error prevention by tracing errors to their most basic origins. Although a refined theory of diagnostic error prevention will take years to formulate, we focus on communication breakdown, a major contributor to diagnostic errors and an increasingly recognized preventable factor in medical mishaps. We describe a comprehensive framework that integrates t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this could lead to a Bfresh^perspective, it also hindered the clinicians' ability to assess changes over time and likely decreased the quality of information transfer. 36 Moreover, numerous hospitalizations and diagnostic tests made the patient's medical record long and cumbersome to review, potentially contributing to communication breakdown. It also likely led subsequent providers to miss key details earlier in the patient's presentation, potentially excluding unrecognized pertinent information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this could lead to a Bfresh^perspective, it also hindered the clinicians' ability to assess changes over time and likely decreased the quality of information transfer. 36 Moreover, numerous hospitalizations and diagnostic tests made the patient's medical record long and cumbersome to review, potentially contributing to communication breakdown. It also likely led subsequent providers to miss key details earlier in the patient's presentation, potentially excluding unrecognized pertinent information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, even with this more narrow focus of improving diagnosis through use of EHRs, how best to achieve this is not yet clear. Limited evidence exists to support alerts, selected triggers, patient panel management and diagnostic protocols to prevent diagnostic error [18][19][20]. Unfortunately, the evidence basis remains scant for many of the tactics by which technology could theoretically improve the diagnostic process.…”
Section: Electronic Health Record (Ehr) Adoption In the Unitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows some of these possibilities and was created to complement the DEER taxonomy but focuses on EHR usage [20]. In particular, strategic use of EHRs in the following categories appears potentially beneficial to the diagnostic process: documentation, care coordination, patient engagement, automation, physician and patient checklists, next step guidance, redundancy avoidance, monitoring, and broadened differential diagnoses [10,16,[18][19][20]22]. For example, when applied judiciously and in the appropriate workflow context, diagnostic error triggers already have a growing body of evidence behind their benefits [18,23].…”
Section: Electronic Health Record (Ehr) Adoption In the Unitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Test result management in an electronic health record (EHR)-enabled health care system is susceptible to both technological and non-technological vulnerabilities. 10,11 EHR-based test result notification systems are aimed at reducing delays in follow-up of abnormal test results, and likely represent an improvement over communication using paper-based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%