This program was based on a study of rehospitalization rates by Jencks et al., 2 which highlighted inadequate care coordination by hospitals in Medicare patient hospital discharges, resulting in an approximately 20% readmission rate within 30 days of discharge. The Readmission Reduction Program established a Medicare diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment reduction for hospitals that exceeded the adjusted national average readmission rate for three diagnoses: acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia. For fiscal year 2013, the potential reduction was up to 2% of the following year's total DRG payments, and a further reduction of up to 3% of total DRG payments in fiscal year 2014.Application of the high readmission penalty specifically to the dialysis population has also been proposed, based on the high rate of readmission noted by Jencks et al. 2 and data reported by the US Renal Data System showing an overall rehospitalization rate for patients with ESRD of 34% within 30 days of discharge. 3 This 70% higher rate of hospital readmission brought readmissions of the dialysis population into consideration for a quality metric of the Quality Improvement Program, which can affect up to 2% of the Prospective Payment System for dialysis. 1 The study by Erickson et al. 4 in this issue of JASN highlights the potential relationship between the rate of readmission of dialysis patients and the frequency of face-to-face health care provider (physician and/or advanced practitioner) visits at the dialysis facility in the month after hospital discharge. The mean number of provider-patient interactions among patients who were rehospitalized or died within 30 days of a hospital discharge was 2.161.6 episodes, significantly below the frequency of 3.361.2 episodes among patients who were not rehospitalized and did not die within 30 days of discharge. Among patients who were not rehospitalized, close to 65% were seen $4 times during those 30 days compared with 32.4% of rehospitalized patients. Instrumental variable regression analysis estimated that one additional provider visit (compared with the average of 2.861.5 provider visits per month) may reduce the probability of rehospitalization by an absolute difference of 3.5%, or a relative reduction of 9.7% in the rate of rehospitalization. The authors further highlight the resulting economic health care benefits of an additional provider visit in the 30 days after hospitalization, which they estimate conservatively to be .$240 million in aggregate cost savings to Medicare funds.It is evident that the increased frequency of nephrologist visits to the dialysis unit can be optimized with essential information from the discharging hospital, and timing of the additional visit based on the physician's rounding schedule can be optimized by coordination with the discharge event. However, the association noted by Erickson et al. 4 should be considered in any plan to reduce rehospitalizations in the dialysis population.Maximizing the benefit of increased physician vi...