Developing Community Schools, Community Learning Centers, Extended-Service Schools and Multi-Service Schools 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25664-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redesigning a Core Function of Schools: A Systemic, Evidence-Based Approach to Student Support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That possibility suggests another strategy for improving outcomes: combining psychotherapy with in vivo support for addressing real-world circumstances that could otherwise limit improvement and over which youths acting alone would have little control. Such an approach would contrast with the primarily office-based approach that has dominated youth psychotherapy research and practice for many years, but a few innovative intervention researchers have achieved success pioneering this more ecologically embedded approach (e.g., Buchanan, Chamberlain, & Smith, 2017; Henggeler & Schaeffer, 2016; Walsh, Theodorakakis, & Backe, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That possibility suggests another strategy for improving outcomes: combining psychotherapy with in vivo support for addressing real-world circumstances that could otherwise limit improvement and over which youths acting alone would have little control. Such an approach would contrast with the primarily office-based approach that has dominated youth psychotherapy research and practice for many years, but a few innovative intervention researchers have achieved success pioneering this more ecologically embedded approach (e.g., Buchanan, Chamberlain, & Smith, 2017; Henggeler & Schaeffer, 2016; Walsh, Theodorakakis, & Backe, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three inherited assumptions produce and sustain this disengagement dyad: (1) Disengaged students' orientations and action, not school policies, structures, and routines, are the problem to be addressed; (2) teachers hold the keys to student engagement; and (3) the ideal student is obedient and compliant, not an active agent able to assume responsibility for their engagement, learning plans, and outcomes [29]. Entire school systems are vulnerable to get stuck when these assumptions reign without interrogation and interruption, especially when teachers are compelled to work in isolation without both districtwide and community-based systems for assistance, supports, and resources.…”
Section: From Student Disengagement To Teacher Disengagementmentioning
confidence: 99%