2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining Chlorobotryaceae as one of the principal and most diverse lineages of eustigmatophyte algae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we recovered Olisthodiscophyceae with full statistical support as a lineage sister to Pinguiophyceae. This relationship has previously only been seen with low to moderate support in trees based on datasets of concatenated plastid genome-encoded proteins (Barcytė et al 2021; Barcytė et al 2022). Likewise, we have full support for the coccoid alga “ Botrydiopsis ” pyrenoidosa to represent an independent class-level lineage, sister to Phaeophyceae and Schizocladiophyceae, instead of being nested in the class Xanthophyceae (where it is formally classified together with genuine members of the genus Botrydiopsis ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, we recovered Olisthodiscophyceae with full statistical support as a lineage sister to Pinguiophyceae. This relationship has previously only been seen with low to moderate support in trees based on datasets of concatenated plastid genome-encoded proteins (Barcytė et al 2021; Barcytė et al 2022). Likewise, we have full support for the coccoid alga “ Botrydiopsis ” pyrenoidosa to represent an independent class-level lineage, sister to Phaeophyceae and Schizocladiophyceae, instead of being nested in the class Xanthophyceae (where it is formally classified together with genuine members of the genus Botrydiopsis ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many new generic names for diatoms were introduced from the 1970s onward as more taxonomically useful morphological characters become apparent under SEM and were assessed in relation to phylogenetic data. The Rhodophyta, similarly, have rich, complex reproductive systems that facilitate phylogenetic hypotheses, although recent molecular studies are revealing even more variation at the genus level, particularly in the Ceramiales (e.g., Barros-Barreto et al, 2023).…”
Section: How Many Species Are There?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most species‐rich classes are the Chlorophyceae and Ulvophyceae with nearly the same number of genera (Table 4). The Chlorodendrophyceae Masjuk, 2006 (a typified name, Chlorodendron Senn; see Barcyte et al., 2022), Chloropicophyceae Lopes dos Santos & Eikrem, 2017, a typified name (T: Chloropicon Lopes dos Santos & Eikrem), Chuariophyceae Gnilovskaya & Ischenko (in Gnilovskaja et al., 1988, as “Chuariaphyceae,” apparently extinct; a typified name, T: Chuaria C.Walcott), Mamiellophyceae Marin & Melkonian, 2010 (a typified name, T: Mamiella Moestrup), Nephroselmidophyceae T. Nakayama et al., 2007 (a typified name, T: Nephroselmis F.Stein), Pedinophyceae Moestrup, 1991 (a typified name, T: Pedinomonas Korshikov in Isachenko, 1921), Picocystophyceae Eikrem & Lopes dos Santos in Lopes dos Santos et al., 2017 (a typified name, T: Picocystis R.A.Lewin), and Pyramimonadophyceae Moestrup & Daugbjerg (in Daugbjerg et al., 2019, a typified name, T: Pyramimonas Schmarda) are relatively recent, small segregate classes suggesting perhaps that others will be found.…”
Section: Chlorophytamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classification of organisms has become exciting again, especially when common ground between the two eras is found. In some cases, the re‐definition of a taxon may simply be enough (Barcytė et al, 2022), while in others, novel higher‐rank taxa emerge and deserve formal recognition (Barcytė et al, 2021; Li et al, 2020; Muñoz‐Gómez et al, 2017). This latter scenario is what applies to the the enigmatic red algal class Cyanidiophyceae revised recently by Park et al (2023) and highlighted here.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%