Redefining Academic Integrity, Authorship, and Innovation: The Impact of ChatGPT on Surgical Research

Seth, Ishith; Bulloch, Gabriella; Lee, Chun Hin Angus

doi:10.1245/s10434-023-13642-w

Cited by 11 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, investigations into ethical considerations, privacy safeguards, and secure integration with electronic health records are paramount to ensure responsible and secure implementation in medical practice. Continuous collaboration between AI developers, healthcare professionals, and researchers is crucial to harness the potential benefits of ChatGPT while mitigating its limitations for safe and effective integration into medical settings (18,(24)(25)(26)(27).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications and Impact

GOGLIA,

PACE,

YUSEF

et al. 2024

In Vivo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aim: The integration of AI and natural language processing technologies, such as ChatGPT, into surgical practice has shown promising potential in enhancing various aspects of abdominopelvic surgical procedures. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the current state of research on the applications and impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT in abdominopelvic surgery summarizing existing literature towards providing a comprehensive overview of the diverse applications, effectiveness, challenges, and future directions of these innovative technologies. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of major electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, was conducted from October to November 2023, to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies that investigated the utilization of AI and ChatGPT in abdominopelvic surgical settings, including, but not limited to preoperative planning, intraoperative decision-making, postoperative care, and patient communication. Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications and Impact

GOGLIA,

PACE,

YUSEF

et al. 2024

In Vivo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…15 ChatGPT has understanding for oculoplastic research and can conduct thorough literature reviews, proposing novel experiments, improving surgical results through personalized surgical planning and patient communication within this domain. 16 Highlighting the implications of ChatGPT in plastic surgery research, Najafali et al 21 reported its ability to perform PRISMA systematic review and metanalyses from its own dataset. Similarly, other researchers 18,20,21,25,3 mentioned that it can only generate ideas for systematic reviews at this stage.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Manuscriptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4,26,27,37,40 Therefore, ChatGPT can only serve as a supplementary tool for cosmetic consultations 27,43 rather than a replacement for human decision-making 8 or as an author for research paper writing. 3,16 Additionally, one study discovered that while it can generate code for task execution, the results achieved using this generated code were incorrect when compared to other mesh (vertex and polygon) algorithm processing methods. 15…”

Section: Limitations Of Chatgptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the application of CHATGPT in plastic surgery: a comprehensive systematic review

Fizzah Arif,

Mohammad Khozema Safri,

Zenab Shahzad

et al. 2024

J Pak Med Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine the impact of ChatGPT in plasticsurgery research and assess the authenticity of such contributions. Methods: The study conducted a literature search inSep’23 from databases like Pubmed, Google Scholar,SCOPUS, and OVID Medline.The following keywords‘ChatGPT’, ‘chatbot’, ‘reconstruction’, ‘aesthetic’ and‘plastic surgery’ were used. 32 papers were included fromthe initial 131 results of articles. English language articlesfrom November 2022 to July 2023 discussing ChatGPT'srole in plastic and aesthetic surgery were includedwhereas non-English documents, irrelevant content, andnon-academic sources were excluded from the study. Results: The manuscripts included in the systematicreview had a diverse range, including original researcharticles, case reports, letters to the editor, and editorials.Among the included studies, there were 9 originalresearch articles, 1 case report, 23 letters to the editor, and2 editorials. Most publications originated from the UnitedStates (18) and Australia (7). Analysis suggested concerns,such as inaccuracies, plagiarism, outdated knowledge,and lack of personalized advice. Various authorsrecommend using ChatGPT as a supplementary toolrather than a replacement for human decision-making inmedicine. Conclusion: ChatGPT shows potential in plastic surgeryresearch, concerns about inaccuracies and outdatedknowledge may provide deceiving information and italways requires human input and verification.Keywords: Plastic, ChatGPT, Reconstructive Surgery,Aesthetic Surgery, Chatbot. Keywords: Plastic, ChatGPT, Reconstructive Surgery, Aesthetic Surgery, Chatbot.

show abstract

“…The literature reviewed in this study includes a range of perspectives on ChatGPT, from its potential benefits and drawbacks to ethical considerations related to the technology (Seth et al, 2023 ). The findings suggest that while early research is still limited by the scope of available data, there are already some clear implications for future research and practical applications in various fields.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer

Watters,

Lemanski

2023

Front. Big Data

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ChatGPT, a new language model developed by OpenAI, has garnered significant attention in various fields since its release. This literature review provides an overview of early ChatGPT literature across multiple disciplines, exploring its applications, limitations, and ethical considerations. The review encompasses Scopus-indexed publications from November 2022 to April 2023 and includes 156 articles related to ChatGPT. The findings reveal a predominance of negative sentiment across disciplines, though subject-specific attitudes must be considered. The review highlights the implications of ChatGPT in many fields including healthcare, raising concerns about employment opportunities and ethical considerations. While ChatGPT holds promise for improved communication, further research is needed to address its capabilities and limitations. This literature review provides insights into early research on ChatGPT, informing future investigations and practical applications of chatbot technology, as well as development and usage of generative AI.

show abstract

Redefining Academic Integrity, Authorship, and Innovation: The Impact of ChatGPT on Surgical Research

Cited by 11 publications

References 2 publications

Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications and Impact

Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications and Impact

Exploring the application of CHATGPT in plastic surgery: a comprehensive systematic review

Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About